Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2013/iii/paper-55/4/i/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 55 4 i Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Let . The present-extrapolated spherical-collapse barrier is , where is the linear contrast extrapolated to spherical collapse in a matter-dominated universe. It is not the nonlinear interior overdensity . The cosmological mass variance is the variance of the present-extrapolated linear density contrast smoothed over a mass . It is not the variance of already virialized halo densities.
For a fixed-shape smoothing filter and , rescale the variance integral with :Thus , with and a normalization carrying the appropriate mass units. For a real-space top-hat filter, convergence requires ; a spectrum outside this interval needs physical cutoffs and does not have this unrestricted scale-free result.
If counts halos per comoving volume, the Press-Schechter halo mass function follows by differentiating the cumulative mass fraction and converting mass fraction to number:The minus sign is needed because the cumulative fraction decreases with . To match the printed exponential coefficient exactly, define byThis peak-height calibration from an exponential mass-function cutoff differs from the also-common convention . Here , and consequentlyEquivalently . The scale-free halo cutoff normalization therefore evolves with ; the displayed is not a redshift-independent universal constant. For physical number density, replace by instead. Since , it grows as ; in matter domination it is proportional to . At the collapse epoch itself, .
New to topics? Read the docs here!