Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2013/iii/paper-9/1/a/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 9 1 a Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
For a unit direction , let be a length-one Kakeya tube with transverse radius , centered at , and define the Kakeya maximal function byUsing normalized surface measure on the direction sphere, the Kakeya maximal conjecture is the following family of estimates, in the formulation relevant to this paper:The constant is independent of and . Replacing round Kakeya tubes by comparable rectangular tubes changes only dimensional constants.
A bounded Kakeya set contains a unit line segment in every direction. The Kakeya Minkowski dimension conjecture says that every such set has full Minkowski dimension . The maximal estimate in fact gives full lower as well as upper Minkowski dimension.
To prove that implication, let . Each unit segment in has a thinner tube contained in , so for every , with a fixed dimensional . Apply the maximal estimate to this indicator function:If is the smallest number of radius- balls covering , that cover, enlarged by a fixed factor, covers . Thus andTaking the lower limit of and then letting gives lower Minkowski dimension at least . Bounded subsets of have upper Minkowski dimension at most . Consequently both dimensions equal , which proves the requested implication.
New to topics? Read the docs here!