Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2014/iii/paper-38/2/c/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 38 2 c Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Let be the predictable stock holding during . Cash has constant price, so self-financing givesPut . The tower property of conditional expectation and -measurability of giveSince , and are -measurable, substituting the gains identity yieldsThe denominator is positive on every positive-probability parent atom. If it were zero on such an atom, would be constant there, and the martingale property would force that constant to equal , contradicting the nonzero-increment assumption. HenceThis is conditional covariance hedge ratio. It uses attainability; a regression coefficient alone would not replicate a general unattainable payoff. After maturity one may liquidate into cash, so the same formula gives zero for later dates wherever its denominator remains nonzero. On a finite sample space a martingale cannot have nonzero increments forever; the stated nondegeneracy is naturally a finite-maturity assumption.
New to topics? Read the docs here!