Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2014/iii/paper-38/2/c/solution

Let be the predictable stock holding during . Cash has constant price, so self-financing gives
Put . The tower property of conditional expectation and -measurability of give
Since , and are -measurable, substituting the gains identity yields
The denominator is positive on every positive-probability parent atom. If it were zero on such an atom, would be constant there, and the martingale property would force that constant to equal , contradicting the nonzero-increment assumption. Hence
This is conditional covariance hedge ratio. It uses attainability; a regression coefficient alone would not replicate a general unattainable payoff. After maturity one may liquidate into cash, so the same formula gives zero for later dates wherever its denominator remains nonzero. On a finite sample space a martingale cannot have nonzero increments forever; the stated nondegeneracy is naturally a finite-maturity assumption.

New to topics? Read the docs here!