Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2014/iii/paper-67/3/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 67 3 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use , so the Fourier transform of is . Distinguish the full degree- polynomial from its homogeneous top-degree part , the principal symbol. The elliptic differential operator condition isIt does not require the full polynomial to be nonzero at small frequencies. Compactness of the unit sphere gives . Homogeneity and the lower-degree remainder implyFor sufficiently large the second term is at most half the first, so the high-frequency lower bound for an elliptic polynomial isHere is the Japanese bracket. The order-zero case just means a nonzero constant and is immediate.
For real , the Sobolev space definition with the current Fourier normalization isChanging the harmless constant in the norm gives the same space. A distribution on belongs to the Local Sobolev space when , extended by zero outside , belongs to for every test function .
A compactly supported distribution of finite order of a distribution has a smooth Fourier transform satisfying , by applying the finite-order estimate to a fixed cutoff times the exponential. Thus its weighted squared transform is bounded by . This is integrable precisely in the sufficient range , and provesThis is the negative Sobolev regularity of a compactly supported distribution; the strict inequality is important, and is not a claim that this sufficient threshold is optimal for each distribution.
To establish elliptic regularity without assuming the answer as an a priori smoothness hypothesis, first obtain a global constant-coefficient gain. For a compactly supported distribution with , the polynomial lower bound at high frequency givesOn , the transform of is smooth and bounded. Therefore implies . Possible low-frequency zeros of are harmless; we never divide by them.
Two elementary mapping facts supply the variable-coefficient argument. Distributional derivatives of order map into . Sobolev multiplication by a smooth cutoff is bounded on for every real , including negative ones. Indeed, for a compactly supported smooth , the Peetre weight inequalityand reduce the bound to Young's convolution inequality with the integrable kernel . Smooth coefficients only need this property on compact subsets, where they can be multiplied by another cutoff.
Write the lower-order part as , with , and suppose provisionally that on a relatively compact neighborhood. For a cutoff function supported there,The bracket is the operator commutator. Its order is at most : in the product rule, every surviving term has at least one derivative falling on . Choose a second cutoff function equal to one near when estimating the products. The derivative and smooth-multiplication bounds then giveThe global gain just proved applies to the compactly supported distribution , and yieldsThis is the cutoff bootstrap for local elliptic regularity; it works for real indices, not just nonnegative integers.
There is always a legitimate starting index. Around any fixed point choose on a smaller neighborhood. The compactly supported distribution has the negative Sobolev regularity proved above, so on that neighborhood for some finite . The index need not be uniform over all of . Repeating the one-step gain finitely many times reaches , or the target is already reached if . Since the point was arbitrary,For the result follows directly by dividing by the nonzero constant.
Finally, if , its forcing belongs to every Local Sobolev space. The gain consequently gives every local Sobolev order for . For each integer , choose an order larger than and apply the Sobolev embedding theorem to a localized solution. It has a representative; the representatives agree because they represent the same distribution. Thus every distributional solution of is smooth on .
New to topics? Read the docs here!