Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2015/iii/paper-14/1/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 14 1 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use probability measure-preserving systems: is measurable and . Its invariant sigma-algebra isErgodicity means that every invariant measurable set has measure zero or one:Equivalently, every invariant measurable function is constant almost everywhere. Indeed all rational sublevel sets of a real invariant function belong to , so the zero-or-one alternative forces its distribution to concentrate at one value. Apply this to real and imaginary parts for complex functions. Conversely, an invariant set has an invariant indicator, so the function criterion implies the set criterion. This is the invariant-function characterization of ergodicity.
For an irrational rotation of the circle, with , an invariant has Fourier coefficients satisfyingFor the multiplier is nonzero. Completeness of the Fourier series basis therefore makes constant. Apply this to an invariant indicator to prove the irrational rotation is ergodic. A second example is the cyclic permutation of points with equal masses: a nonempty invariant set contains the whole cycle and hence has measure one.
The identity on with Lebesgue measure is not ergodic, since is invariant and has measure . Nor is rotation by on the circle: the setis invariant and has measure . These examples also show why preservation of measure does not imply ergodicity.
Let be the Koopman operator, , and setThe Von Neumann mean ergodic theorem says that, for , these Cesaro averages converge in to the orthogonal projection onto the invariant functions:For an invertible system, is a unitary operator. The Hilbert-space theorem states more generally that the Cesaro averages of any unitary operator converge strongly to its fixed-space projection.
Here is the requested invertible-case proof. Since ,Thus the orthogonal decomposition for unitary ergodic averages isOn the first summand, . On a vector , telescoping givesBecause , approximation extends this convergence to the closure of the range. The orthogonal decomposition now proves the theorem for every . An invariant function is -measurable, and an -measurable function is invariant by approximation with indicators; hence the projection is the stated conditional expectation.
In an ergodic system, invariant functions are constants by the criterion already proved. Their orthogonal projection is obtained by taking the inner product with , whose norm is one. Therefore the ergodic limit is the space average:
The Birkhoff ergodic theorem states that, for ,The limit is invariant, integrable, and has the same integral as . On a probability space convergence also holds in . In an ergodic system the limit is almost everywhere.
For the topological sharpening, take a continuous map on a compact metric space. Unique ergodicity means there is exactly one invariant Borel probability measure . The uniform ergodic convergence for uniquely ergodic systems says that every continuous real or complex satisfiesThus convergence holds at every point and uniformly in that point. The continuity, compactness and continuous-observable hypotheses belong to this theorem; it is not a claim of uniform convergence for all measurable functions.
New to topics? Read the docs here!