Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2015/iii/paper-22/5/c/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 22 5 c Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Let exhibit a reflective subcategory, with reflector , and let be a small diagram in a category. Completeness of gives a categorical limit of . For every , the universal property of this categorical limit and the reflection adjunction giveThe composite is precomposition with , so satisfies the hom-set condition from the preceding part. Its proof of invertibility of did not require repleteness. Thus whether or not the chosen full reflective subcategory is replete.
Transport the ambient limit cone along . Its legs lie in the full subcategory, and their ambient universal property, restricted to objects of , is exactly the internal categorical limit property. Hence every small diagram in the reflective subcategory has a limit:For a replete subcategory, the ambient limit object itself belongs to . This argument includes the empty diagram and requires no limit-preservation hypothesis on the reflector.
New to topics? Read the docs here!