Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2015/iii/paper-68/3/b/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 68 3 b Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
First let be a bounded linear operator on satisfying the symmetric positive-definiteness convention in part (a). For any direction , expansion of the quadratic functional givesThus vanishing of the first variation in every direction is precisely the weak equation for every . In this whole-space bounded-operator setting it is equivalent to , the Euler-Lagrange equation.
If solves that equation, set . The linear terms cancel:with equality only when . Hence the weak solution is the unique global minimizer. Conversely, any minimizer has zero first variation, and therefore solves the weak equation. For a symmetric bounded bilinear form on a form space , exactly the same calculation gives and for every ; it does not require an unbounded differential operator to map every into .
Existence for every requires an extra hypothesis if “positive definite” means only strict positivity. The coercive operator bound makes the form coercive, so the Lax-Milgram theorem supplies existence and uniqueness. Without that bound, the diagonal operator on sequence space on is symmetric and strictly positive, but belongs to and its formal inverse does not. Thus strict positivity alone proves uniqueness and the minimizing property of a solution when one exists, not existence for all .
New to topics? Read the docs here!