For , stationarity under fixed-endpoint variations gives
For an autonomous scalar integral , the first variation gives the integrated Euler-Lagrange equation . If is and each fiber of is finite, the connected image of the interval under the continuous derivative lies in a finite set and is therefore a singleton. The fixed endpoints then determine exactly one affine solution. If is strictly convex, the strict Jensen's inequality applied to additionally makes this solution the unique global minimizer among fixed-endpoint Lipschitz functions. Without convexity the same unique smooth stationary solution can be a maximizer, for example at zero for and zero endpoint values.
If a smooth functional has integrand independent of the function value, a weak local minimizer satisfies the displayed first integral almost everywhere. Its first variation gives for every compactly supported test function. Thus the distributional derivative of vanishes, making it constant on the interval. Equivalently, any smooth compactly supported function with integral zero is the derivative of such a test function, so the first-variation identity says that agrees with a single constant against all tests. This reduces the Euler-Lagrange equation from a second-order equation to an algebraic relation in .
For positive twice differentiable functions , the Euler-Lagrange equation for this functional reduces to . Thus and integration gives . The upper circular arc is a graph wherever its radicand is positive. A fixed horizontal endpoint with free height imposes , so that endpoint must lie above the centre. Distinct horizontal endpoints cannot both satisfy this natural boundary conditions for a free endpoint. The Beltrami identity alone also admits constant functions, which are excluded by the full Euler-Lagrange equation.
Adding a total derivative to a Lagrangian changes its action only by . Under fixed-endpoint variations, this boundary term is constant, so the Euler-Lagrange equations and their minimizing paths are unchanged. Componentwise, by equality of mixed partial derivatives. Endpoint freedom would require reconsidering the resulting natural boundary conditions for a free endpoint.
Motion on a sphere with speed proportional to has travel-time line element proportional to . With , this becomes the flat cylinder metric . Shortest lifted paths are straight lines. Nonvertical lines give ; vertical lines are meridians of constant . The poles lie at infinite travel-time distance.
An isoperimetric constraint fixes the value of an integral while optimizing another integral over functions. A constant Lagrange multiplier incorporates the constraint into the variational integrand, and the resulting Euler-Lagrange equation must be supplemented by the appropriate natural boundary conditions for a free endpoint. The name includes integral constraints more general than prescribed geometric length.
For a nonnegative graph joining and with length between and , the area-maximizing smooth graph is a circular arch. The Euler-Lagrange equation integrates to the displayed circle formula. Its radius satisfies with . Concavity of gives global maximality on the fixed-length class.
A circular arch of chord length described as a smooth single-valued graph has radius and length , ranging strictly between and . The straight-line limit has length . At the semicircle limit the endpoint slopes are infinite. Longer circular arcs require overhangs and cannot be graphs in this class.
If the first variation of the constraint vanishes in every allowed direction, the objective coefficient in a general multiplier equation can vanish. One must then allow with coefficients not both zero. Normalizing to one requires the regularity condition used for a normal isoperimetric extremal.
A constrained extremal is normal when the constraint functional has a nonzero first variation in some allowed direction. The implicit function theorem then permits a compensating variation, yielding a multiplier equation with objective coefficient normalized to one. The Euler-Lagrange equation applies to the objective integrand minus the multiplier times the constraint integrand.
For a regular closed planar curve, maximize signed enclosed area at fixed length using the variational integrand . Write the nonzero speed as . The Euler-Lagrange equations integrate to and . A zero multiplier would force a zero velocity, so squaring and adding yields the displayed circle. The argument uses only regularity and is independent of the speed used to trace the curve. A positively oriented simple traversal of prescribed length encloses area ; the planar isoperimetric inequality supplies the separate global maximality statement.
For uniform linear mass density , a chain minimizing at fixed length has Beltrami identity . In the domain , the displayed potential has downward gravitational acceleration . A circular arc satisfies the identity because .
This arc is a global minimum among admissible competitors of the same length with the same endpoints in . Set . The variable part of the energy is , a hyperbolic length in the Poincaré half-plane model. The calibration for semicircular hyperbolic geodesics has . The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives , with equality along the circle traversed with increasing . The constant-potential part is unchanged by the fixed-length constraint.
For a single-valued curve below the chord joining to , with length , the maximum enclosed area is attained by the lower minor circular arc. Equivalently it minimizes at fixed length. Its equation and length are
To prove global minimality for , augment the objective by . The augmented integrand is linear in and strictly convex in . The displayed arc satisfies its Euler-Lagrange equation, so the supporting-line inequality for the convex slope dependence, followed by integration by parts, proves it minimizes the augmented functional among curves with the prescribed endpoints. On the fixed-length class the multiplier term is constant. The semicircle endpoint follows by a limit; its endpoint tangents are vertical but its length is finite.
For , write and . Integration by parts gives , while . The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality therefore gives the displayed sharp bound, with equality exactly when . A prescribed positive budget consequently gives
This proves the unique global optimum, rather than only stationarity from a Lagrange multiplier.
The area of a surface of revolution about the horizontal axis is . For a curve below the axis with endpoints and fixed arc length, its stationarity is equivalent to stationarity of . The Beltrami identity gives . Choosing , imposing the endpoints and integrating the length gives the displayed curve. The function increases strictly from to infinity on , so every determines exactly one positive . Stationarity alone does not establish a global minimum.
When a variational integrand has no explicit dependence on the independent variable, every extremal satisfies
If the integrand has no explicit dependence on its independent variable , its Euler-Lagrange equations imply the displayed first integral. Indeed, differentiate the left side and cancel the second-derivative terms to obtain . This is the several-variable form of the Beltrami identity. Applied to Fermat principle, it expresses conservation of the component of the optical momentum of a ray along a translation-invariant direction.
A catenary is a curve of the form . It is the equilibrium shape of a uniform flexible chain in a uniform gravitational field.
Among curves of fixed arc length joining to , the hanging catenary globally minimizes . Parametrize a competitor by arc length , so . Integration by parts and the fixed horizontal endpoint separation give, for every ,
The inequality is the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Equality requires and . Integration gives the catenary
The last equation has a unique positive , since increases strictly for . The equality curve is a single-valued graph below the chord, so the same global bound proves the result under those additional restrictions.
When the values of are free at both fixed endpoint locations, integration by parts leaves the boundary term . Since the endpoint variations are arbitrary, stationarity requires
For a functional , two applications of integration by parts leave the boundary term
If the endpoint displacement is fixed but its slope is free, while is arbitrary. The first variation therefore forces at that endpoint. For the beam energy density with , this gives , the zero-bending moment condition. A clamped endpoint instead prescribes the slope and has .
A pointwise constraint on the initial derivative need not be closed in the norm controlling the value and first-derivative square integrals. For example, minimize with , and . The attained minimum is , uniquely achieved by , with natural condition . Adding excludes this minimizer but leaves the same infimum. Multiplying by and rescaling to restore the integral gives smooth admissible approximations converging in energy. The formal quadratic from the interior Euler-Lagrange equation and two initial conditions alone is therefore not a true minimizer.
For
with free terminal values, the Euler-Lagrange equations and natural conditions give a nonzero stationary family exactly when . It is
For
independent variations and integration by parts give

Ancestors (4)

  1. Analysis
  2. Area of mathematics
  3. Mathematics
  4. Home

Discussion (0) New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (2)

The Euler–Lagrange equation is a fundamental equation in the calculus of variations, which is a field of mathematics that deals with optimizing functionals. A functional is typically an integral that depends on a function and its derivatives. In particular, the Euler–Lagrange equation is used to find the function (or functions) that will minimize (or maximize) a certain integral, usually representing some physical quantity, such as action in physics.
Let's start with the one dimensional case. Let the and a Functional defined by a function of three variables :
Then, the Euler-Lagrange equation gives the maxima and minima of the that type of functional. Note that this type of functional is just one very specific type of functional amongst all possible functionals that one might come up with. However, it turns out to be enough to do most of physics, so we are happy with with it.
Given , the Euler-Lagrange equations are a system of ordinary differential equations constructed from that such that the solutions to that system are the maxima/minima.
In the one dimensional case, the system has a single ordinary differential equation:
By and we simply mean "the partial derivative of with respect to its second and third arguments". The notation is a bit confusing at first, but that's all it means.
Therefore, that expression ends up being at most a second order ordinary differential equation where is the unknown, since:
  • the term is a function of
  • the term is a function of . And so it's derivative with respect to time will contain only up to
Now let's think about the multi-dimensional case. Instead of having , we now have . Think about the Lagrangian mechanics motivation of a double pendulum where for a given time we have two angles.
Let's do the 2-dimensional case then. In that case, is going to be a function of 5 variables rather than 3 as in the one dimensional case, and the functional looks like:
This time, the Euler-Lagrange equations are going to be a system of two ordinary differential equations on two unknown functions and of order up to 2 in both variables:
At this point, notation is getting a bit clunky, so people will often condense the vector
or just omit the arguments of entirely:
Video 1.
Calculus of Variations ft. Flammable Maths by vcubingx (2020)
Source.