Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2015/iii/paper-76/1/b/solution

Put
In free space, the parabolic wave equation is . Under the Fourier transform convention , it becomes
The Gaussian integral is legitimate because . Invert the transform after multiplying by . A second Gaussian integral, or equivalently one-dimensional transverse Fresnel propagation, gives
Choose the square-root branch continuously from ; for real there is no zero of . This gives the correct incident field at , and direct differentiation verifies the free parabolic wave equation.
For clarity, the squared envelope magnitude is
The Gaussian beam with one transverse coordinate remains Gaussian, with one-transverse-coordinate amplitude factor , not the of a beam with two transverse coordinates. The negative initial quadratic phase produces focusing for ; diffraction prevents a singularity at . These expressions describe the paraxial approximation to free propagation, rather than an exact unrestricted Helmholtz equation beam.

New to topics? Read the docs here!