Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2017/iii/paper-105/3/2/g/solution

If , the right-hand side of the local L1 contraction for scalar conservation laws estimate is zero. Applying it on a countable collection of rational intervals and final times proves almost everywhere in space-time. Thus
To deduce nonnegativity one needs a one-sided comparison, rather than merely putting in the absolute-value estimate. The difference satisfies the weak equation with flux . Subtract its weak integral identity from the Kato inequality for scalar conservation laws and divide by two. The result is the same inequality for
When both expressions vanish; when , . The shrinking-interval proof therefore bounds the negative part by its initial negative part. This is order preservation for scalar entropy solutions.
The constant is an entropy solution for every , even if , because the constant flux has zero spatial derivative. If , its initial negative part is zero, and comparison gives
This explicitly establishes the additional sign conclusion without incorrectly identifying uniqueness alone with order preservation.

New to topics? Read the docs here!