Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2017/iii/paper-105/3/2/g/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 105 3 2 g Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
If , the right-hand side of the local L1 contraction for scalar conservation laws estimate is zero. Applying it on a countable collection of rational intervals and final times proves almost everywhere in space-time. Thus
To deduce nonnegativity one needs a one-sided comparison, rather than merely putting in the absolute-value estimate. The difference satisfies the weak equation with flux . Subtract its weak integral identity from the Kato inequality for scalar conservation laws and divide by two. The result is the same inequality forWhen both expressions vanish; when , . The shrinking-interval proof therefore bounds the negative part by its initial negative part. This is order preservation for scalar entropy solutions.
The constant is an entropy solution for every , even if , because the constant flux has zero spatial derivative. If , its initial negative part is zero, and comparison givesThis explicitly establishes the additional sign conclusion without incorrectly identifying uniqueness alone with order preservation.
New to topics? Read the docs here!