Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2017/iii/paper-130/2/i/solution

We prove the Hales-Jewett theorem by mathematical induction on the alphabet size. A combinatorial line has a nonempty active coordinate set, with one common letter in all those coordinates. More generally, a -dimensional combinatorial subspace has disjoint nonempty active coordinate sets, each with an independently variable letter.
First prove the alphabet insensitivity lemma, rather than assume it. Fix distinct letters , colors, and dimension . Partition the coordinates into consecutive blocks of lengths , chosen from left to right. Put and choose
Construct the variable blocks from right to left. When working on block , the later blocks have already become -parameter words, while all earlier coordinates remain unrestricted. For each , take the color vector of the word having in block , indexed by every earlier word and every assignment to the later parameters. There are entries and hence at most different vectors. The pigeonhole principle gives with identical vectors. Fix the first positions of this block to , fix its last positions to , and make the intervening positions a new variable block. Substituting or there gives exactly the two equal color vectors.
This equality holds for every earlier word and every later parameter assignment. Restricting the earlier coordinates in subsequent steps therefore preserves it. Likewise, the insensitivity already proved in a later block survives every restriction of earlier coordinates. At the end, we obtain a -dimensional combinatorial subspace whose induced finite coloring is unchanged whenever any parameter switches between and , with all other parameters fixed. Multiple switches preserve the color by successive single switches. This is the alphabet insensitivity lemma in full.
For alphabet size , one coordinate is already a monochromatic combinatorial line. Suppose the Hales-Jewett theorem has been proved for alphabet size , and let . Apply the proved alphabet insensitivity lemma with letters to get a -dimensional combinatorial subspace in . Restrict its parameter words to . The induction hypothesis gives a monochromatic combinatorial line in these parameters. The union of its active parameter blocks is nonempty, so its image is a combinatorial line in the original coordinates. Its additional point with active letter has the same color as the point with active letter , by insensitivity. Therefore all points have one color, proving
The construction supplies a finite recursive bound; optimal bounds are not needed.

New to topics? Read the docs here!