Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2017/iii/paper-214/1/b/ii/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 214 1 b ii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The strips are nested. Every connection permitted inside is also permitted inside , so for every fixed separation. ConsequentlyThe preceding nonnegative bound makes this a decreasing sequence bounded below. By monotone convergence of real sequences,There is no assertion that this limit of a sequence is strictly positive: positivity at each fixed width need not survive an increasing-width limit of a sequence.
One can also identify the limit of a sequence. Let be the percolation two-point connection probability in the whole square lattice. Every finite connecting graph path has a bounded vertical extent, so . Commuting infima gives the strip approximation to the planar connection decay rate:The same positive-association argument identifies the final infimum with the whole-plane normalized logarithmic limit of a sequence. This is an interchange of infima justified by monotonicity at fixed . For example, when , the threshold proved in question 2 and uniqueness give an infinite percolation cluster with root probability . The Harris-FKG inequality makes the probability that both endpoints belong to it at least , so . The whole-plane rate, and hence , is then zero, despite the strict positivity of every finite-strip rate.
New to topics? Read the docs here!