 Solution

The difficulty is an unfavorable engineering scaling, rather than a fundamental diameter cutoff. For the same passive support concept and fixed allowed sag, the elastic plate estimate gives $t\propto D^2$. Consequentlywhere $\kappa$ is the thermal diffusivity. Thus increasing diameter makes the casting, annealing, transport and support progressively harder, while its long thermal diffusion time prevents the mirror following the changing ambient temperature. Temperature gradients deform the surface; a warm mirror also creates local turbulence that worsens astronomical seeing. A thinner solid disk has a shorter thermal response but is too flexible without better support.

The quoted four-metre scale is a practical rule of thumb for the simple thick passive design, not an absolute physical impossibility. The official BTA description records a 6.05-metre, 42-tonne primary already operating well before this examination. Its existence rules out interpreting the stated number as a hard bound.