Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-year-1-of-the-natural-sciences-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2006/paper-2/2/b/solution

Expanding the two products of Householder reflections gives
The commuting plane reflections criterion follows: the operator vanishes if the normals are orthogonal, or if they are parallel. Conversely, if and the operator vanishes, applying to gives , proving parallelism.
This establishes equality of the reflected directions for every incident ray exactly in those two cases. For one fixed ray the claim needs that qualification: if nonparallel normals are not orthogonal, a ray along has zero normal component for both mirrors and is unchanged in either order. Algebraically it lies in the kernel of the commutator; it is a special direction rather than a pair of commuting reflection operators.

New to topics? Read the docs here!