Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-year-1-of-the-natural-sciences-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2006/paper-2/2/b/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the year 1 of the natural sciences course of the University of Cambridge 2006 Paper 2 2 b Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
Expanding the two products of Householder reflections givesThe commuting plane reflections criterion follows: the operator vanishes if the normals are orthogonal, or if they are parallel. Conversely, if and the operator vanishes, applying to gives , proving parallelism.
This establishes equality of the reflected directions for every incident ray exactly in those two cases. For one fixed ray the claim needs that qualification: if nonparallel normals are not orthogonal, a ray along has zero normal component for both mirrors and is unchanged in either order. Algebraically it lies in the kernel of the commutator; it is a special direction rather than a pair of commuting reflection operators.
New to topics? Read the docs here!