Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-year-2-of-the-natural-sciences-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2018/paper-2/10/c/solution

Use the standard Hermitian inner product . Since is invariant under every , it is in particular invariant under
Let and . Then
because and is orthogonal to . Thus is orthogonal to every , proving
Therefore is an invariant subspace for . If is irreducible, is either or . In finite-dimensional inner product space, , so these alternatives force or . Hence
No unitarity of was assumed; the inverse-adjoint representation is exactly what makes this orthogonal complement argument work.

New to topics? Read the docs here!