Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-metric-spaces-and-complex-analysis-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2023/1/a/iii/solution
Past exam of the metric spaces and complex analysis course of the University of Oxford 2023 1 a iii Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
First suppose is a closed set. If , the definition in part (ii) gives an open ball disjoint from . Thus every has , and the distance to a set satisfies . Its contrapositive is the required implication.
Conversely, suppose that zero distance to a set forces membership. For we have . Choose . Then , proving is an open set. HenceFor , use the extended-real convention : both assertions hold, with the implication vacuous. Part (b) only uses nonempty sets, so all its distances to a set are ordinary finite real numbers.
New to topics? Read the docs here!