First suppose is a closed set. If , the definition in part (ii) gives an open ball disjoint from . Thus every has , and the distance to a set satisfies . Its contrapositive is the required implication.
Conversely, suppose that zero distance to a set forces membership. For we have . Choose . Then , proving is an open set. Hence
For , use the extended-real convention : both assertions hold, with the implication vacuous. Part (b) only uses nonempty sets, so all its distances to a set are ordinary finite real numbers.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.