Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-number-theory-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2007/a/2/solution

The formal derivative is additive and satisfies . For monomials, . Distributing over the finitely many coefficients proves the product rule over any field. If in an extension, the rule gives , so , including in characteristic two. If were relatively prime in , the Bézout's identity for polynomials would give , whose evaluation at is impossible. Hence they are not relatively prime.
In characteristic zero, the formal derivative of a positive-degree irreducible polynomial is nonzero and has smaller degree. Thus , since an irreducible polynomial has no proper nonconstant factor. By the previous argument, has no repeated root. Every element of a finite field extension is algebraic, so the extension is a separable extension.
For , let . The characteristic- identity gives , so is already a splitting field. It is a proper extension by the allowed no-root fact. More precisely, the minimal polynomial of an algebraic element divides and, over , equals for some . If , its next-to-leading coefficient is , forcing because in , a contradiction. Hence its minimal polynomial of an algebraic element is , with its one root repeated times. The extension is therefore inseparable, of degree .
By contrast, every finite field extension is a separable extension. If , then . Lagrange's theorem in its nonzero multiplicative group gives for all . Thus every element is a root of , whose formal derivative is ; it has no repeated roots. Every minimal polynomial of an algebraic element divides this separable polynomial, proving the assertion.

New to topics? Read the docs here!