Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-options-ii-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2004/d/d4/b/solution

False in both cases. Without the zero-at-zero condition, and already give an integrable input and a non-integrable composition on .
Even imposing does not control how fast approaches zero. Take and the continuous function . The input has integral , but
has a divergent integral, because its tails are comparable to . Thus continuity at zero is weaker than the linear growth estimate that would preserve integrability.

New to topics? Read the docs here!