 Solution

For $m\ddot{x}+b\dot{x}+kx=F_0\cos \omega t$, define ${\omega }_0=\sqrt{k/m}$ and $\beta =b/(2m)$. The parameter relating quality factor and viscous damping regimes isAt weak damping it also equals $2\pi$ times stored energy divided by energy lost per cycle. The stored-energy convention and frequency matter: this cycle-based interpretation should not be extended to free motions that never complete a cycle.

For $\beta <{\omega }_0$ the free motion is $e^{-\beta t}[A\cos {\omega }_{d}t+B\sin {\omega }_{d}t]$, where ${\omega }_d=\sqrt{{\omega }_0^2-{\beta }^2}$. Thus underdamping means $Q>1/2$. High $Q$ gives many oscillations per amplitude-decay time, narrow resonance and strong frequency selectivity; a lightly loaded tuning fork, optical cavity or low-loss electrical resonator provides examples. The amplitude decay time is ${\tau }_A=1/\beta =2Q/{\omega }_0$, while the slowly averaged energy decays with ${\tau }_E=1/(2\beta )=Q/{\omega }_0$. These times differ by a factor of two.

At critical damping, $\beta ={\omega }_0$ and $Q=1/2$, with $x=(A+Bt)e^{-{\omega }_{0}t}$. There is no ringing; a simple critically damped position indicator can settle without oscillation. For $\beta >{\omega }_0$ and $Q<1/2$, there are two real negative decay rates $-\beta \pm \sqrt{{\beta }^2-{\omega }_0^2}$. Increasing very strong drag slows the long-time return, whose rate approaches ${\omega }_0^2/(2\beta )$. A strongly viscously damped mechanical indicator illustrates this regime. These classifications concern the linear homogeneous equation, not every possible nonlinear damping law.

The driven displacement amplitude isThe displacement-resonance threshold of a viscous oscillator requires $\beta <{\omega }_0/\sqrt{2}$, or $Q>1/\sqrt{2}$; it lies at $\sqrt{{\omega }_0^2-2{\beta }^2}$. Some underdamped systems therefore have no such maximum. Average absorbed power instead peaks at ${\omega }_0$ for this viscous model. Its half-power frequencies are $\sqrt{{\omega }_0^2+{\beta }^2}\pm \beta$, so their separation is $2\beta$ and $Q={\omega }_0/\Delta \omega$. For broad response this ratio remains a useful parameter but not a claim of many free oscillations. The familiar displacement-linewidth version is a high-$Q$ approximation.

A series RLC circuit has ${\omega }_0=1/\sqrt{LC}$ and $Q={\omega }_{0}L/R$ for the charge oscillation. Resistance dissipates energy, inductance provides the inertial analogue and capacitance the restoring analogue. Ringdown and a calibrated half-power scan independently estimate loss; parasitic resistance, loading and radiation change the measured value. A large $Q$ increases frequency selectivity but also lengthens settling time, so it is not universally the best instrumental choice.