b

ID: past-exam-of-the-probability-measure-and-martingales-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2023/2/b

For this part and part (c), take to be -valued everywhere. The uniform distribution gives , but the paper's expression for is undefined there because . Define on . Keep exactly as printed, including on that null set; this preserves the exact sigma-algebra equality in part (ii). Every slope formula below is asserted on , hence almost surely.

New to topics? Read the docs here!