 Solution

The unconstrained cases can be treated as don't-care conditions during Boolean function minimization. One particularly small, deliberately asymmetric choice isUse the same two history D flip-flops and one output D flip-flop, with this expression at the output D input. It requires two two-input AND gates and one OR gate.

To verify every required case, first set $q=0$. If zero occurs at least twice among $a,b,c$, then $ab=0$, so $q^{+}=0$ as required. If all three samples are one, then $ab=1$, so $q^{+}=1$. The remaining triples have exactly two ones and hence exactly one sample agreeing with the old zero; either output is allowed.

Now set $q=1$. If at least two samples are one, either $c=1$ or $a=b=1$, giving $q^{+}=1$. If all three samples are zero, both terms vanish, giving $q^{+}=0$. The remaining triples have exactly one one and are the allowed don't-care conditions. Thus the expression meets both requirements, including every constant-input triple.

For minimality, consider these required one-entries in $(a,b,c,q)$ order: $1110$, $1101$, $1011$ and $0111$ have no common literal. Therefore a product covering all four would be the constant one, which violates required zero-entries. Also no single-literal product is safe: each of $a,b,c,q$ is one at some required zero-entry, and each complemented literal is one at $0000$. Hence at least two products with at least two Boolean literals each are needed. The displayed expression attains two products and four literals.