Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-year-1-of-the-computer-science-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2013/digital-systems-linear-algebra-introduction-to-formal-proof/8/a/ii/solution
Past exam of the year 1 of the computer science course of the University of Oxford 2013 Digital systems, linear algebra, introduction to formal proof 8 a ii Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Choose an arbitrary fresh eigenvariable . If held, existential quantifier introduction rule would contradict the premise. Derive by double-negation elimination, then generalize:
Table 1.
An arbitrary object satisfies the relation
. | Line | Open assumptions | Formula | Justification |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Premise | |
| 2 | 1, 2 | Temporary assumption | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | existential quantifier introduction rule 2; term | |
| 4 | 1, 2 | negation elimination rule 3, 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | negation introduction 2, 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | double-negation elimination 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | universal introduction 6; fresh |
HenceAt the final universal introduction, is free in no open assumption: the only remaining premise is the closed first-order formula . Thus the eigenvariable condition is satisfied. The passage from double negation to the positive relation uses the paper's classical rule.
New to topics? Read the docs here!