Relation between current distortion factor and THD with DC current

ID: relation-between-current-distortion-factor-and-thd-with-dc-current

The relation between current distortion factor and THD with DC current accounts for the mean component omitted from the usual fundamental-normalized total harmonic distortion. For a periodic electric current, let be its signed DC component, the fundamental RMS magnitude, and the RMS magnitudes of higher harmonic components. The Parseval identity gives
Define and current distortion factor . Division by proves
The root mean square in this expression includes the mean, while the stated total harmonic distortion excludes it. An instrument reporting AC-only RMS or a differently normalized distortion quantity requires a correspondingly different conversion.
For an original example, take , and combined higher-harmonic RMS magnitude . Then , and . Neglecting the DC component would instead predict . In the same conductor electrical resistance , the actual heating is , while that omission would predict .
For a zero-mean sinusoidal supply of RMS and an in-phase fundamental current, the example absorbs . Its apparent power is approximately , so total power factor is despite a displacement power factor of one. The DC component carries no average power from that particular zero-mean supply, but it still increases mean-square electric current. If the supply itself has a DC component, its contribution must be included through the harmonic active power sum.
As tends to zero the defining current distortion factor can tend to zero, but fundamental-normalized total harmonic distortion is undefined at . Do not evaluate the boxed relation there by silently dividing by zero. The manufacturer's documentation also uses differing labels for distortion ratios, reinforcing the need to state the defining normalization.[ref][ref]

New to topics? Read the docs here!