Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 26H a by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 25I b by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 25I a by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 24J Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
Letbe the homogeneous coordinate ring. Its Hilbert function agrees for all sufficiently large with a polynomial . Since is a curve,The degree of a projective curve is the positive integer . This is well-defined because the graded ring , and hence its eventual Hilbert polynomial, depends only on the embedded projective variety, while a polynomial agreeing with the Hilbert function for all large integers is unique.
This definition also has the geometric interpretation expected of degree. For a sufficiently general hyperplane that does not contain , multiplication by gives an exact sequenceConsequently, for large ,The left side is the length of the zero-dimensional scheme . Thus a generic hyperplane meets in points counted with intersection multiplicity, independently of the chosen generic hyperplane.
For the stated linear embedding, the homogeneous coordinate ring of isThe graded rings have the same Hilbert polynomial, so degree under a linear projective embedding gives
Degree is nevertheless not an invariant of an abstract curve. In , a line has degree one and the smooth conichas degree two, but the mapidentifies the conic with , as is any projective line.
For the specified set , the equations are the minors ofOn the affine chart , they forceso this chart is an affine line. When , the equations force , leaving the single point . Hence is the twisted cubic, parametrized byIt is therefore an irreducible projective curve. A generic hyperplane pulls back to a binary cubicwhich has three zeros on counted with multiplicity. Thus
No nonzero linear form vanishes on , since substituting its parametrization would make the four coefficients of the displayed binary cubic vanish. Therefore every hypersurface containing has degree at least two. Ifthen is impossible because a nonzero hypersurface in has dimension two. Hence at least two nonconstant are needed, andThis is the degree obstruction to the twisted cubic being a complete intersection.
Finally compare the twisted cubic with a smooth plane cubic, such asviewed in by the given linear embedding. Both curves are irreducible and have degree three. The twisted cubic is isomorphic to and has genus zero, whereas the supplied plane-curve genus formula givesSince genus is an isomorphism invariant, these equal-degree curves are not isomorphic.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 23G Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
Choose an evenly covered neighbourhood and a component of . If is a complex chart, useas a chart on . On overlaps, the transition maps are exactly transition maps between charts of , hence are holomorphic. These charts give the unique complex structure lifted through a covering map for which is a local biholomorphism, and therefore analytic. The Hausdorff assumption is already given; connectedness and the second-countability of a Riemann surface ensure the resulting covering surface has the required manifold properties.
A surface is simply connected when it is path-connected and every loop is null-homotopic, equivalently when its fundamental group is trivial. The uniformization theorem says that every simply connected Riemann surface is biholomorphic to exactly one ofTheir analytic automorphism groups are
A covering space action of on is an action by homeomorphisms such that every has a neighbourhood satisfyingIn particular the action is free. Every nonidentity Möbius transformation of has a fixed point: solving gives a root on the sphere. Consequently a subgroup acting as a covering space action must be trivial. Its quotient is the sphere itself and is Hausdorff.
The Hausdorff conclusion fails on other Riemann surfaces. On
, let withEvery orbit is discrete in and has trivial stabilizer; small enough neighbourhoods have disjoint nontrivial translates, so this is a covering space action. Yet the two orbits throughcannot be separated in the quotient. Indeed, forwe have and . Thus every pair of quotient neighbourhoods of the two distinct orbits intersects, proving that is not Hausdorff.
, let withEvery orbit is discrete in and has trivial stabilizer; small enough neighbourhoods have disjoint nontrivial translates, so this is a covering space action. Yet the two orbits throughcannot be separated in the quotient. Indeed, forwe have and . Thus every pair of quotient neighbourhoods of the two distinct orbits intersects, proving that is not Hausdorff.
Simple connectedness does not repair this. Lift to the universal cover of . Choose the lift preserving the angular interval from to . The lifted points of still converge to a lift of , while their th translates converge to a lift of ; those two lifts belong to different orbits. The lifted action is again a covering space action, and its quotient is non-Hausdorff although is simply connected.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 22H b by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 22H a by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 21I b by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 21I a by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 20F b by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 20F a by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 1G c by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 1G b by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 1G a by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 19J f by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 19J e by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 19J d by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 19J c by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 19J b by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 3 19J a by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-24
There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.