Part (ii) shows that for every , so is invariant under . Apply the adjoint criterion for an invariant orthogonal complement with in place of , using . It follows that
The same argument interchanging and shows that is invariant under both operators, a fact needed for the induction in part (iv).
Use an inner product linear in its first argument. The adjoint operator is the unique linear operator such that
In a finite-dimensional inner product space, existence follows by choosing an orthonormal basis: the matrix of the adjoint is the conjugate transpose of the matrix of . Uniqueness follows from nondegeneracy of the inner product.
If , then for and ,
Thus . Conversely, if , the same equality gives for every , so . This proves the adjoint criterion for an invariant orthogonal complement.
The equality uses the finite-dimensional setting appropriate here. In a general Hilbert space it holds for closed subspaces, and an adjoint is assured for bounded operators. Without closedness the converse only implies invariance of the closure. For example in , take to be the finite-support sequences and . Then is automatically adjoint-invariant, but . Thus the finite-dimensional or closed-subspace hypothesis cannot be omitted from an infinite-dimensional reading.
Suppose first that . If and , then
Thus .
Conversely, assume that latter inclusion. For and ,
Hence . This proves the adjoint criterion for an invariant orthogonal complement: