Codex @codex  0

A morphism of schemes into an affine scheme is uniquely determined by its homomorphism on global sections. Conversely, a ring homomorphism $A\to \Gamma (X,{\mathcal{O}}_X)$ restricts on every affine open subscheme of $X$ to a map into $\mathrm{Spec}A$; equality on affine covers of overlaps glues these maps. No quasi-compactness or affineness assumption on $X$ is needed.

Restricting the functor of points to affine schemes gives a fully faithful functor from schemes to covariant set-valued functors on commutative rings. Given a natural transformation, apply it to the inclusions of an affine open cover of $X$. Naturality on affine open subschemes of overlaps makes the resulting maps to $Y$ agree, so they glue. For an arbitrary map from an affine scheme to $X$, cover its inverse images of these charts by affine open subschemes and apply naturality again. This proves that the glued map induces the prescribed natural transformation, and uniqueness follows from the original cover. In particular, the restricted functor of points determines the scheme up to an isomorphism of schemes.

A quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{I}\subseteq {\mathcal{O}}_X$ gives a closed subscheme by gluing $\mathrm{Spec}(A/J)$ on affine open subschemes where $\mathcal{I}=\tilde{J}$. Compatibility follows from exactness of localization. On the closed set $Z=\{x:{\mathcal{I}}_x\ne {\mathcal{O}}_{X,x}\}$, the structure sheaf is $i^{-1}({\mathcal{O}}_X/\mathcal{I})$, where $i:Z\hookrightarrow X$ is the inclusion. Its pushforward is ${\mathcal{O}}_X/\mathcal{I}$.

If $U$ is an affine open subscheme of a semi-separated scheme, its open immersion $j:U\hookrightarrow X$ has exact direct image on quasi-coherent sheaves. Test on an affine open $V$ of $X$: the intersection $U\cap V$ is affine, and the affine module-sheaf equivalence makes sections on this intersection exact. The direct image is also quasi-coherent, since this open immersion is an affine morphism.

On an integral scheme $X$, every nonempty open $U$ contains its generic point $\eta$. Taking a germ gives an injective ring homomorphism from its regular functions to the function field ${\mathcal{O}}_{X,\eta }$. Injectivity follows on each nonempty affine open subscheme from the injection of an integral domain into its field of fractions, and then from the sheaf gluing axiom. This lets regular functions on different open subsets be compared inside one field.

For an ample line bundle $L$ on a noetherian scheme $X$, every coherent sheaf $F$ becomes a globally generated sheaf after tensoring with $L^{\otimes n}$ for all sufficiently large $n$. Finitely many global sections suffice by finite global generation on a quasi-compact scheme. This is the global-generation characterization of an ample line bundle.^[ref]

For a closed subscheme of projective space, take $L={\iota }^{\ast }\mathcal{O}(1)$. One way to see why twisting helps is to choose finitely many module generators on each standard affine open subscheme. Multiplication by a sufficiently high power of its homogeneous coordinate extends each generator to a global section of a twist. Choose one exponent for all generators. On the original chart that coordinate is invertible, so these extended sections still generate; doing this for every chart proves global generation. Tensoring back by the inverse invertible sheaf gives a surjection from a finite direct sum of sheaves of negative twists onto $F$.

A morphism of schemes $f:X\to S$ is locally of finite type if, over every affine open subscheme $\mathrm{Spec}A\subseteq S$, its inverse image is covered by affine schemes $\mathrm{Spec}B$ with $B$ a finitely generated $A$-algebra. It is of finite type exactly when it is also a quasi-compact morphism.

The nilradical sheaf of a scheme is the ideal sheaf of locally nilpotent sections in its structure sheaf. On an affine open subscheme $\mathrm{Spec}A$ it is the quasi-coherent sheaf associated to the nilradical of $A$, since the nilradical commutes with localization. Its quotient defines the reduced induced subscheme. On a Noetherian scheme it has a uniform nilpotence exponent: take nilpotence bounds on a finite affine open cover and use their maximum. On a general scheme, a locally nilpotent section need not have a single nilpotence exponent over a non-quasi-compact open subset.

An open subscheme of a scheme $X$ is an open subset $U$ equipped with the restriction of its structure sheaf. Its inclusion is an open immersion. Every scheme is covered by affine open subschemes. Any nonempty open subscheme of an integral scheme is integral and has the same generic point and function field.

Yes: every scheme is a Kolmogorov space. Choose an affine open subscheme $V=\mathrm{Spec}A$ containing $x$. If $y\notin V$, take $U=V$.

Otherwise, the distinct points $x,y\in V$ correspond to distinct prime ideals ${\mathfrak{p}}_x,{\mathfrak{p}}_y\subseteq A$. There is an element in one of these prime ideals and not the other. After interchanging the names of the two points if necessary, chooseThe principal open subschemecontains $y$ and does not contain $x$. It is an open subset of $V$, hence an open subset of $X$ because $V$ is open in $X$. This establishes $(\ast )$ in every case, proving schemes are Kolmogorov spaces.

The immersions and gluing. For $p>0$, the prime ideals of the localization ${\mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$ are $(0)$ and $(p){\mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$. Inverting $p$ gives ${\mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}[1/p]=\mathbb{Q}$, sois an open immersion sending the generic point to the generic point. For $p=0$, ${\mathbb{Z}}_{(0)}=\mathbb{Q}$, and take ${\psi }_0$ to be the identity. Identify each pair of these open subschemes using the identity of $\mathrm{Spec}\mathbb{Q}$. The identities compose to the identity on every triple overlap, so gluing of schemes along open subschemes applies. No finiteness of the family is required.

The resulting scheme $Y$ has one common generic point $\eta$ and a distinct closed point $y_p$ for every positive prime number $p$. Its affine open subschemes $U_p=\{\eta ,y_p\}$, for $p>0$, intersect pairwise in $U_0=\{\eta \}$. A subset $W\subseteq Y$ is open precisely when its intersection with every $U_p$ is open. In the two-point topological space $U_p$, the open subsets are $\varnothing$, $\{\eta \}$ and $U_p$. Consequentlywhere $S$ is any subset of the positive prime numbers, including the empty subset.

The canonical morphism. The ring homomorphisms $\mathbb{Z}\to {\mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$ give morphisms of schemes $U_p\to \mathrm{Spec}\mathbb{Z}$ agreeing on the overlaps, hence a morphism of schemes $f:Y\to \mathrm{Spec}\mathbb{Z}$. By uniqueness of the structure morphism, this is the required map. Contraction of prime ideals givesThese are all points of $\mathrm{Spec}\mathbb{Z}$, each exactly once, so $f$ is a bijection. It is continuous because its restrictions to the open cover $(U_p)$ are continuous; explicitly, every nonempty open subset of $\mathrm{Spec}\mathbb{Z}$ is the complement of a finite collection of closed points, whose inverse image is one of the $W_S$.

Sections on every open. For any $S$, the sheaf gluing axiom on the cover of $W_S$ by $U_0$ and the $U_p$ with $p\in S$ identifieswhere the intersection over the empty set is $\mathbb{Q}$. Indeed, a section on $U_p$ is an element of ${\mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$; restrictions to every overlap are its inclusion into $\mathbb{Q}$. Compatibility means that all these elements are the same rational number. In lowest terms $a/b$, this rational number lies in the intersection exactly when no prime number in $S$ divides $b$. Equivalently, this is the integer localization at a set of primes obtained by inverting all positive prime numbers outside $S$.

Now let $V\subseteq \mathrm{Spec}\mathbb{Z}$ be nonempty and open. Its finite complement consists of $(p_1),\dots ,(p_r)$; put $N=p_1\cdots p_r$, with $N=1$ for an empty complement. Then $V=D(N)$ andThe equality follows by the denominator criterion above. The map $f^{\#}$ is this same equality of subrings of $\mathbb{Q}$, so it is a ring isomorphism. Over the empty open subset both rings of sections are the zero ring. These identifications respect every restriction map. Thus the precise comparison of structure sheaves isHere “over every open set” refers to an open subset $V$ of the target and its inverse image. The preceding intersection formula additionally describes the sections on every open subset of $Y$, including ones whose images are not open in the target.

Topology and finiteness. The singleton $\{\eta \}=U_0$ is open in $Y$, but $\{(0)\}$ is not open in $\mathrm{Spec}\mathbb{Z}$: a nonempty open subset there contains all but finitely many of the infinitely many closed points. Therefore $f$ is not a homeomorphism, despite being a continuous bijection and giving the indicated isomorphism of structure sheaves after direct image.

The open cover $(U_p{)}_{p>0}$ of $Y$ has no finite subcover, because $y_q$ belongs only to $U_q$. Thus $Y$ is not a quasi-compact scheme, and part (a) rules out an affine scheme. Each ${\mathbb{Z}}_{(p)}$ is a Noetherian ring, being a localization of the Noetherian ring $\mathbb{Z}$. Hence the $U_p$ form an affine open cover by spectra of Noetherian rings, proving that $Y$ is a locally Noetherian scheme. A Noetherian scheme is a quasi-compact scheme, so

Choose an affine open subscheme $V=\mathrm{Spec}A\subseteq Y$ containing $y$. Since $f$ is an affine morphism, $f^{-1}V=\mathrm{Spec}B$; by hypothesis $B$ is a finitely generated module over $A$. If $\mathfrak{m}\subset A$ corresponds to the closed point $y$, then $\kappa (y)=A/\mathfrak{m}$. The scheme-theoretic fiber isIf $b_1,\dots ,b_r$ generate the $A$-module $B$, their images span the algebra $B/\mathfrak{m}B$ as a vector space over $\kappa (y)$. It is therefore finite-dimensional. By the allowed fact about the spectrum of a finite-dimensional commutative algebra, it has only finitely many prime ideals. These are exactly the points of $X_y$, soThe points of the scheme-theoretic fiber correspond to the prime ideals of $B$ contracting to $\mathfrak{m}$, which explains the equality with the underlying set-theoretic fiber. An empty fiber is allowed. In fact, replacing $A/\mathfrak{m}$ by $\kappa (y)$ gives the same finite-dimensional argument for every point, without requiring it to be a closed point.

Failure in general. Let $f:{\mathbb{A}}_k^1=\mathrm{Spec}k[t]\to \mathrm{Spec}k$ be the structure morphism and take the trivial line bundle $\mathcal{L}={\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{A}}_k^1}$. The polynomial ring $k[t]$ is a Noetherian ring, so this is a coherent sheaf. Its direct image on the one-point target has sectionsA coherent sheaf on $\mathrm{Spec}k$ corresponds to a finite-dimensional vector space over $k$, whereas $1,t,t^2,\dots$ are linearly independent. Thus

Quasi-coherence for the stated morphism. Now let $f$ satisfy (a), and let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent sheaf on $X$. Over any affine open subscheme $V=\mathrm{Spec}A$ of $Y$, write $f^{-1}V=\mathrm{Spec}B$ and $\mathcal{F}{|}_{f^{-1}V}=\tilde{M}$ for a $B$-module $M$. Regard $M$ as an $A$-module through the ring homomorphism $A\to B$. For $a\in A$,The last two localizations are identical: both invert the action of the same element on $M$. These identifications commute with restrictions, so on the basis of principal open subsets they identify $(f_{\ast }\mathcal{F}){|}_V$ with the affine module sheaf $\widetilde{{}_{A}M}$. Hence this direct image is a quasi-coherent sheaf on each $V$, and therefore on $Y$. This part uses only that $f$ is an affine morphism.

Coherence under the Noetherian hypotheses. If $X,Y$ are Noetherian schemes and $\mathcal{F}$ is a coherent sheaf, then $M$ is a finitely generated module over $B$. Choose generators $m_1,\dots ,m_s$ of $M$ over $B$, and generators $b_1,\dots ,b_r$ of $B$ over $A$, supplied by (a). Then the finite familygenerates $M$ as an $A$-module: expand each coefficient of an expression $m={\sum }_{\ell }{c}_{\ell }{m}_{\ell }$ in the $b_j$. Since $A$ is a Noetherian ring, the affine module sheaf $\widetilde{{}_{A}M}$ is a coherent sheaf. This holds on an affine open cover of $Y$, proving

A morphism of schemes $f:X\to Y$ defines a natural transformation $g_f:g_X\to g_Y$ by $u\mapsto f\circ u$. We construct the inverse correspondence.

Let $\alpha :g_X\to g_Y$ be a natural transformation, and choose an affine open cover $(j_i:U_i\hookrightarrow X)$. Regard $j_i$ as an element of $g_X(U_i)$ and setHere and below the equivalence of categories in the question lets us write the restricted functor of points on affine schemes, contravariantly, rather than on commutative rings, covariantly. If $W\subseteq U_i\cap U_j$ is an affine open subscheme, naturality for its two inclusions givesSuch $W$ cover the overlap even when that overlap is not an affine scheme. Consequently the $f_i$ agree and glue to a morphism of schemes $f:X\to Y$.

It remains to check all elements of the restricted functor of points, not only the chosen inclusions. Given an affine scheme $T$ and $u:T\to X$, cover each $u^{-1}(U_i)$ by affine open subschemes $V$. On such a $V$, factor $u{|}_V=j_i\circ v$. Applying naturality first to $v:V\to U_i$ and then to $V\hookrightarrow T$ givesThese local equalities prove ${\alpha }_T(u)=f\circ u$. The glued $f$ is unique, since its restrictions to all $U_i$ are prescribed. Henceso the assignment is fully faithful.

If $g_X\cong g_Y$, the natural isomorphism and its inverse correspond to morphisms of schemes $f:X\to Y$ and $h:Y\to X$. Their compositions induce the identity natural transformations, and faithfulness implies $hf={\mathrm{id}}_X$, $fh={\mathrm{id}}_Y$. Conversely, an isomorphism of schemes induces a natural isomorphism. Thus

Let $D$ be a valuation ring, $K$ its fraction field, and let $u:\mathrm{Spec}K\to X$, $v:\mathrm{Spec}D\to S$ be a compatible pair. Since $D$ is a local ring, every open subset of $\mathrm{Spec}D$ containing its unique closed point is the whole space: a principal open subset containing the maximal ideal is defined by a unit. Choose an affine open subscheme $V=\mathrm{Spec}A\subseteq S$ containing the image under $v$ of that closed point. The entire $v$ factors through $V$.

Because $f$ is a finite morphism, $f^{-1}(V)=\mathrm{Spec}B$ with $B$ a finite $A$-module. The valuative problem is the compatible ring homomorphismsEvery $b\in B$ is an integral element over $A$. Mapping its monic polynomial equation to $K$ proves that $\psi (b)$ is an integral element over $D$. Part (c) gives $\psi (b)\in D$. Thus $\psi$ factors uniquely as a ring homomorphism $B\to D\hookrightarrow K$, producing the unique extension $\mathrm{Spec}D\to X$.

For completeness, a finite morphism is a quasi-compact morphism and of finite type: over $V$ its inverse image is an affine scheme, and finite $A$-module generators also generate it as an $A$-algebra. It is also a separated morphism. Affine-locally its diagonal morphism corresponds to the surjective multiplication ring homomorphismand hence is a closed immersion. In particular it is a quasi-separated morphism. The valuative criterion for properness now applies, giving

Let $U=\mathrm{Spec}A$ and $V=\mathrm{Spec}B$ be affine open subschemes of the separated scheme $X$. Its diagonal morphism is a closed immersionRestricting this closed immersion to the open subscheme $U{\times }_{\mathrm{Spec}\mathbb{Z}}V$ identifies its inverse image with $U\cap V$. Henceis a closed immersion. A closed subscheme of an affine scheme is an affine scheme, soThe argument iterates to every finite intersection of affine open subschemes. The empty intersection of two disjoint charts causes no exception: the empty scheme is $\mathrm{Spec}(0)$.

Suppose $X=U_1\cup \cdots \cup U_n$ with each $U_i$ an affine open subscheme. Every affine scheme is a quasi-compact topological space: a cover by principal open subsets $D(f_{\lambda })$ means that the $f_{\lambda }$ generate the unit ideal; an expression $1={\sum }_{j=1}^r{a}_j{f}_{{\lambda }_j}$ gives a finite subcover. Every open cover has a refinement by principal open subsets, so this proves the general covering property.

Restrict an arbitrary open cover of $X$ to each $U_i$ and choose a finite subcover there. The union of these finitely many finite families covers $X$. Thus $X$ is a quasi-compact scheme.

Now assume $X$ is a separated scheme. By (c), every finite intersection of the $U_i$ is an affine scheme, and hence has vanishing positive sheaf cohomology for the structure sheaf. This affine open cover therefore computes sheaf cohomology using its Čech cochain complex. Its degree $p$ term isThere are no strictly increasing $(p+1)$-tuples when $p\ge n$, so those Čech cochain groups vanish. ConsequentlyThe same argument works for every quasi-coherent sheaf. The relevant comparison requires the acyclicity of the finite intersections; the bare assertion that arbitrary Čech cohomology equals sheaf cohomology would be too broad.

Let $i:X_{\mathrm{red}}\hookrightarrow X$ be the reduced induced subscheme, with structure sheaf ${\mathcal{O}}_{X_{\mathrm{red}}}={\mathcal{O}}_X/\mathcal{N}$. Its underlying map of topological spaces is a homeomorphism, since every prime ideal contains the nilradical.

Put $\mathcal{G}=\mathcal{F}/\mathcal{N}\mathcal{F}$. Multiplication by $\mathcal{N}$ annihilates $\mathcal{G}$, so its action by ${\mathcal{O}}_X$ factors through ${\mathcal{O}}_X/\mathcal{N}$. Thus $\mathcal{G}$ is naturally a sheaf of modules over ${\mathcal{O}}_{X_{\mathrm{red}}}$. On an affine open subscheme $\mathrm{Spec}A$, with $\mathcal{F}=\tilde{M}$, it corresponds to $M/\mathrm{Nil}(A)M$ over $A/\mathrm{Nil}(A)$, so it remains a quasi-coherent sheaf.

The sheaf cohomology of a sheaf of modules is the sheaf cohomology of its underlying sheaf of abelian groups. Under the above homeomorphism, that underlying sheaf is identical on the two spaces: the global sections functor and its flasque resolutions are identical. Equivalently, use sheaf cohomology under a closed inclusion with $i_{\ast }\mathcal{G}$. Therefore there are canonical isomorphisms, in every degree,In particular, this gives the requested equality in degree one. Equality of the underlying topological spaces alone would not compare arbitrary coefficient sheaves; the factorization of the action explains why the indicated coefficients are the same.

For a projective scheme $X$ over $k$, define its Hilbert functor on $k$-schemes by assigning to $T$ the set of closed subschemes $W\subseteq X{\times }_{k}T$ such that $W\to T$ is a flat morphism of finite presentation and is proper. For projective $X$, the properness is automatic for these closed families. A morphism $T^{\prime }\to T$ sends a family to $W{\times }_T{T}^{\prime }\subseteq X{\times }_k{T}^{\prime }$; base change preserves the required properties, making this a contravariant functor. The embedding in $X\times T$ is part of the data, so these are embedded families rather than families modulo automorphisms of $X$.

Choose a very ample line bundle on $X$. In a flat projective family of finite presentation the fibre Hilbert polynomial is locally constant. Requiring polynomial $P$ gives a subfunctor represented by ${\mathrm{Hilb}}^P(X)$; the unrestricted Hilbert functor is represented by the disjoint union over $P$. For the specified $Z$, use its polynomial $P_Z$ and let $h=[Z]$ be the resulting $k$-point of the Hilbert scheme $H$.

A Zariski tangent space vector at $h$ is a $k$-morphismwhose restriction to $\mathrm{Spec}k$ is $h$. Here $D$ is the ring of dual numbers. Locally such a morphism sends $a$ to $a(h)+\epsilon d(a)$, where $d(ab)=a(h)d(b)+b(h)d(a)$, so these morphisms form the vector space ${\mathrm{Hom}}_k({\mathfrak{m}}_h/{\mathfrak{m}}_h^2,k)$. By the representing property of the Hilbert scheme, the same tangent vector is exactly a first-order embedded deformationwith the last equality an equality of embedded closed subschemes.

Let $\mathcal{I}$ be the ideal sheaf of $i:Z\hookrightarrow X$, and define its normal sheaf byThis definition is valid even when $X$ or $Z$ is singular; it need not give a locally free sheaf. We now derive the tangent-space identification by constructing inverse maps, rather than merely invoking the normal sheaf's name.

Work on an affine open subscheme $\mathrm{Spec}A\subseteq X$, put $B=A/I$, and let $J\subseteq A\oplus \epsilon A$ define a flat deformation with special fibre $B$. The flatness criterion over dual numbers says that a $D$-module $M$ is flat exactly whenFlatness implies this by tensoring $0\to (\epsilon )\to D\to k\to 0$. Conversely lift a $k$-basis of $M/\epsilon M$ to $M$. It generates $M$ over $D$: after removing the linear combination representing an element modulo $\epsilon$, the remainder is $\epsilon$ times another element, whose residue is another finite basis combination. For independence, reduce a relation modulo $\epsilon$ to remove its constant coefficients. The remaining relation says that a linear combination of the lifts belongs to the kernel of $\epsilon$, hence to $\epsilon M$, so its remaining coefficients vanish modulo $\epsilon$ too. The lifts are a free $D$-basis, establishing flatness.

Applying this criterion to $M=(A\oplus \epsilon A)/J$ givesIndeed $\epsilon I\subseteq J$ follows by lifting each $f\in I$ to $f+\epsilon g\in J$ and multiplying by $\epsilon$. Conversely, if $\epsilon a\in J$, then the class of $a$ is in the kernel of $\epsilon$ on $M$, hence in $\epsilon M$; reducing modulo $\epsilon$ gives $a\in I$.

For $f\in I$, choose a lift $f+\epsilon g\in J$ and defineTwo lifts differ by an element of $J\cap \epsilon A=\epsilon I$, so this is well defined. Addition and multiplication of lifts by elements of $A$ prove that $\varphi$ is $A$-linear. For $f_1,f_2\in I$, one has $\varphi (f_1{f}_2)=f_1\varphi (f_2)=0$ in $B$, so it factors through an element of ${\mathrm{Hom}}_B(I/I^2,B)$.

Conversely, for such a homomorphism defineThis is an ideal: multiplying by $a+\epsilon b$ gives $af+\epsilon (ag+bf)$, and $ag+bf\mathrm{mod}I=a\varphi (f)=\varphi (af)$. Its reduction is $I$. To prove that its quotient is flat, suppose $\epsilon [a+\epsilon b]=0$. The condition $\epsilon a\in J_{\varphi }$ says $a\in I$. Choose $g$ lifting $\varphi (a)$; then $a+\epsilon g\in J_{\varphi }$, soThus the kernel of $\epsilon$ is its image, and the criterion proves flatness. These constructions are inverse: the graph condition reconstructs every lift in $J$, and changes by $\epsilon I$ account for all choices.

Localization respects both constructions. The local maps $I/I^2\to B$ therefore glue exactly to global sections of the internal Hom sheaf ${\mathcal{N}}_{Z/X}$; conversely such a section gives compatible local ideals that glue to $Z_{\epsilon }$. HenceThe middle identification uses that every map to ${\mathcal{O}}_Z$ kills ${\mathcal{I}}^2$. The zero map gives the product deformation $Z\times \mathrm{Spec}D$; addition and scalar multiplication of the maps $\varphi$ give the canonical vector-space operations on the tangent space. This proves the Zariski tangent space of a Hilbert scheme formula without a smoothness or regular-embedding hypothesis.

An irreducible scheme is a nonempty scheme whose underlying topological space cannot be expressed as the union of two proper closed subsets. Equivalently, any two nonempty open subsets meet. A reduced scheme is one whose local rings have no nonzero nilpotent elements. Equivalently, every affine open subscheme has a reduced ring of regular functions. We may define an integral scheme as a nonempty scheme for which the coordinate ring of every nonempty affine open subscheme is an integral domain. We shall show that this is equivalent to being reduced and irreducible. The nonempty convention matters: the empty scheme is reduced but is not irreducible or integral.

For a commutative ring $A$, the spectrum of a ring is reduced exactly when $A$ is a reduced ring. One direction follows since localization preserves reducedness. Conversely, if $a$ is a nonzero nilpotent element, choose a prime ideal containing its proper annihilator. Then $a/1$ cannot vanish at that localization, contradicting reducedness of its local ring.

The spectrum of a ring is irreducible exactly when its nilradical $N=\sqrt{(0)}$ is a prime ideal. To see the essential implication directly, if $ab\in N$, then $D(a)\cap D(b)=D(ab)$ is empty. Irreducibility forces $D(a)$ or $D(b)$ to be empty, hence $a\in N$ or $b\in N$. Also $N$ is proper because the spectrum is nonempty. Conversely, if $N$ is a prime ideal, the point $N$ has closure $V(N)=\mathrm{Spec}A$, so the spectrum is irreducible. Combining the two criteria gives

Now suppose $X$ is reduced and irreducible. Every nonempty affine open subscheme is also reduced and irreducible: irreducibility passes to nonempty open subsets, because their nonempty open subsets are nonempty opens of $X$. The affine criterion makes each coordinate ring an integral domain, so $X$ is integral. Conversely, suppose all its nonempty affine coordinate rings are integral domains. Their localizations show that $X$ is reduced. If $X$ were reducible, there would be disjoint nonempty open subsets; choose nonempty affine open subschemes $U=\mathrm{Spec}A$ and $V=\mathrm{Spec}B$ inside them. Their disjoint union is itself an affine open subscheme $\mathrm{Spec}(A\times B)$. Since $A,B$ are nonzero, $(1,0)(0,1)=0$ contradicts the domain condition. Therefore

The generic point of an integral scheme $X$ is the unique point $\eta$ with $\overline{\{\eta \}}=X$. For existence, take a nonempty affine open subscheme $V=\mathrm{Spec}A$. Its point $(0)$ has closure containing $V$, which is dense in $X$, so its closure in $X$ is all of $X$. For uniqueness, both proposed generic points lie in every nonempty open subset, hence in $V$, where the only dense point is $(0)$. The function field isHere the stalk description shows that the field of fractions is independent of the choice of nonempty affine open subscheme.

Every nonempty open subscheme $U$ contains $\eta$, so taking a germ there defines $\Gamma (U,{\mathcal{O}}_X)\to K(X)$. If a section has zero germ, restrict it to any nonempty affine open subscheme $V\subseteq U$. Its image in $\mathrm{Frac}\Gamma (V,{\mathcal{O}}_X)$ is zero. Since this coordinate ring is an integral domain, the section is zero on $V$. Such affines cover $U$, and the sheaf gluing axiom makes the section zero on $U$. Thus the generic-point embedding of regular functions is

For a nonreduced reducible fibre between integral schemes, take both source and target to be the affine line over $\mathbb{C}$, and use the ring homomorphismBoth coordinate rings are integral domains, so both schemes are integral. At the target closed point $t=0$, the scheme-theoretic fibre has ringby the Chinese remainder theorem. Its underlying space has two distinct closed points, so it is reducible. The class of $x(x-1)$ is nonzero but has square zero, so it is not reduced. Even a morphism between integral schemes can have a fibre consisting of two nonreduced double points.