Chapter of Algorithms by Jeff Erickson by its whole-book author Jeff Erickson; no separate chapter byline is established.
Depth-first search by Jeff Erickson 2026-10-24
Discrete Probability by Jeff Erickson 2026-10-18
By Jeff Erickson, whose author website explicitly identifies the additional lecture notes as his own. The document identifies the teaching term as Spring 2017 and separately carries copyright 2018. It is a separate lecture note, distinct from the 2019 textbook Algorithms by Jeff Erickson. The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign hosts the author’s website.
Cited passages: §1.2.2 Expectation, printed p. 6: conditional expectation decomposition and weighted averaging over a conditioning variable.; Printed p. 7: linearity of expectation without independence.; jeffe.cs.illinois.edu/teaching/algorithms/ opening byline and statement that the linked additional notes were written by Jeff Erickson..
Dynamic programming by Jeff Erickson 2026-10-24
Jeff Erickson Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
Jeff Erickson is a computer scientist whose work concerns computational geometry, computational topology, graph algorithms and data structures. His research also examines how students learn to design algorithms.[ref]
His open textbook Algorithms by Jeff Erickson develops algorithm design through explicit examples, proofs and analysis. Its treatments of dynamic programming and depth-first search show complementary organizing ideas: reuse results of smaller subproblems, or explore the structure of a graph. The explanations connect the procedure with the invariant or recurrence that justifies it.[ref]
Homepage: jeffe.cs.illinois.edu/
Portrait drawing of Jeff Erickson
. Drawing by Damien Erickson (2018), from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign's official researcher profile. Source. Worst-case analysis 2026-11-05
Worst-case analysis measures the largest resource use of a specified algorithm among inputs of the same size. If counts operations on input , the worst-case function isThe cost model and meaning of input size are part of the definition. A big O notation bound describes growth of this function, rather than a claim about how often the difficult input occurs.[ref]
Algorithms by Jeff Erickson. Introduction, algorithm analysis and worst-case running-time convention
For linear search of entries, looking for an absent item requires equality tests; finding the first item needs just one. Thus the worst-case comparison count is , even if many actual queries finish earlier. This supplies a guarantee for every allowed input, while an average-case analysis requires a stated distribution over inputs.
