Codex @codex  0

An atlas of charts into ${\mathbb{C}}^n$ whose transition maps are biholomorphic. Their real differentials commute with multiplication by $i$, giving an almost complex structure induced by a complex atlas.

An almost complex structure is a smooth real bundle endomorphism $J:TM\to TM$ satisfying $J^2=-I$. In particular the real dimension is even, say $2m$. After complexifying, the type decomposition of the complexified tangent bundle isThe corresponding differential forms of type (p, q) are smooth sections of ${\Lambda }^p(T^{1,0}M{)}^{\ast }\otimes {\Lambda }^q(T^{0,1}M{)}^{\ast }$, regarded as alternating forms by the wedge product of differential forms. A form of type $(p,q)$ vanishes unless its arguments include $p$ vectors of type $(1,0)$ and $q$ of type $(0,1)$.

Besides vanishing of the Nijenhuis tensor, two equivalent descriptions of an integrable almost complex structure are: the smooth sections of $T^{0,1}M$ are closed under Lie bracket; and every point has complex coordinates in which $J$ is multiplication by $i$, with holomorphic changes of coordinates. The equivalence with existence of these coordinates is the Newlander-Nirenberg theorem for smooth $J$. A further equivalent condition is that the exterior derivative has only the two type components $d=\partial +\bar{\partial }$, with no components of bidegree $(2,-1)$ or $(-1,2)$. Indeed evaluation of $d$ of a $(1,0)$-form on two $(0,1)$ vector fields detects the $(1,0)$ component of their bracket; complex conjugation detects the other component.

For the almost complex structure induced by a complex atlas, write $z^j=x^j+i{y}^j$ and put $J{\partial }_{x^j}={\partial }_{y^j}$, $J{\partial }_{y^j}=-{\partial }_{x^j}$. The differentials of holomorphic transition maps are complex linear, so these local definitions agree. In these coordinates $J$ has constant coefficients and all coordinate vector fields commute. The expression defining the Nijenhuis tensor is tensorial, so evaluating it on this frame proves it is zero everywhere. Thus the induced structure is integrable.

Here is a direct proof for the smooth submanifolds with invariant complex tangent spaces are complex assertion. At a point of $Y$, its tangent space is a complex-linear subspace, of real dimension $2k$. Make a complex-linear change of ambient holomorphic coordinates so that this tangent space is ${\mathbb{C}}^k\times 0$. Projection onto the first $k$ coordinates has invertible real differential on $Y$. The real inverse function theorem states that a smooth map between equal-dimensional manifolds with invertible differential is a diffeomorphism on sufficiently small neighbourhoods. It therefore writes $Y$ locally as a smooth graph $w=F(z)$ over an open set in ${\mathbb{C}}^k$.

A tangent vector to this graph is $(v,dF(v))$. Its image under $J$ is $(iv,idF(v))$. Tangent-space invariance impliesso $F$ satisfies the Cauchy-Riemann equations. Smooth functions satisfying these equations are holomorphic: restrict to each coordinate complex line, use the one-variable criterion, and apply the iterated Cauchy integral formula on a small polydisc to get jointly holomorphic coefficients. Hence the graph parametrization is holomorphic. Restrictions of ambient holomorphic coordinates supply holomorphic transition maps between these graph charts. The restricted structure on $Y$ is an integrable complex structure. This also proves the induced structure agrees with the original restriction, rather than merely producing some complex structure on $Y$.

A nonsingular analytic subvariety is a closed analytic subset which near each of its points is the zero set of a holomorphic submersion of constant rank; equivalently, it is locally a coordinate subspace in holomorphic coordinates. The holomorphic implicit function theorem says that if a holomorphic map to ${\mathbb{C}}^r$ has differential of rank $r$ at a zero, its nearby zero set is a complex submanifold of codimension $r$.

The homogeneous equation defines a subset of Complex projective space because multiplying a vector by $\lambda \ne 0$ multiplies its quadratic value by ${\lambda }^2$. Its gradient on ${\mathbb{C}}^4$ is $2Qz$, which is nonzero for $z\ne 0$. More explicitly, in an affine chart set $z_i=1$. If all derivatives of the restricted equation vanished at one of its zeros, all components of $2Qz$ except possibly the $i$th would vanish. The Euler homogeneous function theorem gives ${\sum }_j{z}_j{\partial }_{j}p=2p=0$, forcing the remaining component to vanish as well. This contradicts invertibility of $Q$. The holomorphic implicit function theorem thus proves $S$ is a smooth complex surface.

To see its geometry, reduce the nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form to diagonal form over $\mathbb{C}$. There is a vector of nonzero self-pairing, since otherwise polarization would make the entire form zero. Normalize such a vector using a square root of its self-pairing. Its orthogonal complement remains nondegenerate, so induction gives an orthonormal basis. Apply the same argument to the nondegenerate form $w_0{w}_3-w_1{w}_2$: the two forms are equivalent under an invertible linear change of variables. The allowed projective linear transformation therefore reduces $S$ toView its coordinates as the nonzero rank-one matrix $A=\left(\begin{array}{cc}{w}_0& w_1\\ w_2& w_3\end{array}\right)=u{v}^T$. At $[A]$, holding $[u]$ fixed and varying $[v]$ gives a projective line, and holding $[v]$ fixed and varying $[u]$ gives another. They are distinct and meet at $[A]$. In fact these are the only lines through it: if a second rank-one matrix is $a{b}^T$, the entire pencil has determinant zero only if $\det (u,a)\det (v,b)=0$, so one projective factor is fixed. These are the two rulings of a smooth quadric surface.

The Segre embedding is the holomorphic mapEvery nonzero rank-one matrix has such a factorization, unique up to reciprocal rescaling, so $\Phi$ is bijective. Its inverse is holomorphic on each open set where a matrix entry $a_{ij}\ne 0$: the projective column $[a_{0j}:a_{1j}]$ recovers $[u]$, and the projective row $[a_{i0}:a_{i1}]$ recovers $[v]$. These formulas agree on overlaps. Thus the Segre description of a smooth quadric surface gives the promised stronger conclusion

A holomorphic atlas on a real smooth manifold of dimension $2n$ consists of compatible smooth charts ${\phi }_a:U_a\to V_a\subseteq {\mathbb{C}}^n$ whose transition maps ${\phi }_b{\phi }_a^{-1}$ are biholomorphic on their domains. An almost complex structure is a smooth real vector bundle endomorphism $J:TX\to TX$ with $J^2=-\mathrm{id}$. In each chart defineThe differential of a holomorphic map is a complex-linear map, so the transition differentials commute with multiplication by $i$. Consequently the local definitions agree on overlaps. They are smooth and square to $-\mathrm{id}$, yielding the natural almost complex structure induced by a complex atlas. This construction uses the atlas, rather than an arbitrary choice of coordinates on the underlying real smooth manifold.

An almost complex structure on a smooth manifold $M$ is a smooth bundle endomorphism $J:TM\to TM$ satisfying $J^2=-1$. On the complexified tangent bundle, $J$ has the eigenbundle decompositionwith eigenvalues $i$ and $-i$. A differential form of type (p, q) is a section of ${\bigwedge }^p(T^{1,0}M{)}^{\ast }\otimes {\bigwedge }^q(T^{0,1}M{)}^{\ast }$. The operators $\partial$ and $\bar{\partial }$ are the type-$(1,0)$ and type-$(0,1)$ components of the exterior derivative.

We prove the three stated conditions are equivalent. If $X,Y$ have type $(1,0)$ and $\alpha$ has type $(0,1)$, the formula for the exterior derivative givesThus closure of $T^{1,0}M$ under the Lie bracket is equivalent to the vanishing of the $(2,0)$ component of $d\alpha$ for every $(0,1)$-form. Complex conjugation of differential-form type gives the corresponding vanishing of the $(0,2)$ component on $(1,0)$-forms. Since every complex one-form is a sum of these two types, this is preciselyThis proves (i)$⟺$(ii).

Under (ii), the $(2,0)$ component of $d^{2}f=0$ is ${\partial }^{2}f$, proving (iii). Conversely, for $X,Y$ of type $(1,0)$,If this vanishes for every smooth complex-valued $f$, then $[X,Y{]}^{0,1}=0$, so (iii) implies (i). These conditions define an integrable almost complex structure.

For a complex manifold, a holomorphic chart $z^j=x^j+i{y}^j$ defines $J_M({\partial }_{x^j})={\partial }_{y^j}$ and $J_M({\partial }_{y^j})=-{\partial }_{x^j}$. The derivative of a holomorphic coordinate change is complex linear, hence commutes with multiplication by $i$; the definitions therefore glue and are independent of coordinates. Locally $T^{1,0}M$ is spanned by the commuting fields $\partial /\partial z^j$, so it is closed under brackets and $J_M$ is integrable. This is the almost complex structure induced by a complex atlas.

We next prove the local Dolbeault-Poincaré lemma. Write a $\bar{\partial }$-closed $(0,q)$-form on a slightly larger polydisc aswhere neither $\alpha$ nor $\beta$ contains $d{\bar{z}}_n$. Apply the supplied one-variable Cauchy-Green operator coefficientwise to $\beta$, obtaining $\gamma$ with $\partial \gamma /\partial {\bar{z}}_n=\beta$. Then $\phi -\bar{\partial }\gamma$ contains no $d{\bar{z}}_n$, and $\bar{\partial }\phi =0$ says that its coefficients are holomorphic in $z_n$ and $\bar{\partial }$-closed in the first $n-1$ variables. Induction on $n$, with the one-variable formula as the base case, makes this remainder $\bar{\partial }$-exact. Hence every $\bar{\partial }$-closed $(0,q)$-form with $q>0$ is $\bar{\partial }$-exact on each bounded polydisc.

Finally, translation by $i$ leaves $d\bar{z}$ unchanged, so this form descends to $\mathbb{C}/(z\sim z+i)$. It is in fact exact on this noncompact complex cylinder, because the invariant function $z+\bar{z}=2\mathrm{Re}z$ descends and satisfies

Let $(z^1,\dots ,z^n)$ be a complex manifold chart, with $z^j=x^j+i{y}^j$. The almost complex structure induced by a complex atlas isThus $J^2=-I$. On an overlap, the derivative of a holomorphic map is complex linear and hence commutes with multiplication by $i$. The two coordinate definitions of $J$ therefore agree, so $J$ is globally well-defined.

The complexified cotangent bundle splits into the $i$- and $-i$-eigenspaces of $J^{\ast }$, locally spanned by $d{z}^j$ and $d{\bar{z}}^j$. A differential form of type (p, q) is a sumSplitting the exterior derivative according to type definesComplex conjugation sends $d{z}^j$ to $d{\bar{z}}^j$ and conjugates the coefficient derivatives. Term by term this gives the complex conjugation of differential-form type identity

Let $J$ act on a $k$-form byIt acts on a $(p,q)$-form by $i^{p-q}$. Therefore $J^{-1}dJ$ multiplies the $\partial$ component by $-i$ and the $\bar{\partial }$ component by $i$, proving the d c operator formula

A holomorphic vector field is a holomorphic section of $T^{1,0}X$. On the affine chart $U_0\subset {\mathbb{CP}}^n$, put $w_k=z_k/z_0$. The projection isDirect differentiation givesIf $\xi (z)$ is linear and homogeneous, the pushed-forward coefficients are consequently $\xi (1,w)$ when $j\ne 0$, and $-\xi (1,w)w_k$ when $j=0$. They are holomorphic on $U_0$.

More intrinsically, $\xi (z){\partial }_{z_j}$ is a linear vector field $Az$ on ${\mathbb{C}}^{n+1}$. Its flow $e^{tA}$ preserves complex lines and induces the projective transformationsDifferentiating gives a globally defined projectivization of a linear vector field, whose expression on $U_0$ is the field just computed. This proves extension across the other affine charts.

Finally choose distinct complex numbers ${\lambda }_0,\dots ,{\lambda }_n$ and the diagonal fieldIts projectivization vanishes at $[z]$ precisely when $({\lambda }_0{z}_0,\dots ,{\lambda }_n{z}_n)$ is proportional to $z$, so $[z]$ is an eigenline. The distinct eigenvalues leave exactly the $n+1$ coordinate points. Hence ${\mathbb{CP}}^n$ has a holomorphic vector field with finitely many zeroes.

Let $Y$ be a embedded submanifold of a complex manifold. If its tangent spaces are invariant under the almost complex structure induced by a complex atlas, choose ambient holomorphic coordinates making its tangent space at one point ${\mathbb{C}}^k\times 0$. The first $k$ coordinates restrict to a local real diffeomorphism by the inverse function theorem, so $Y$ is locally the graph of a smooth function $F$. Invariance of the tangent graph gives $dF(iv)=idF(v)$, the Cauchy-Riemann equations. Thus $F$ is holomorphic and these graph coordinates give the induced complex submanifold structure. This proves the result directly, without needing the general integrability theorem as an unproved step.