Balthasar Bickel 2026-11-05
Balthasar Bickel is a linguist studying the diversification of languages and the mechanisms that constrain it. His research combines comparisons of grammars, lexicons and text corpus resources with experimental methods including electroencephalography and eye tracking. He describes these as complementary approaches to language change and its biological foundations.[ref]
Research profile by Balthasar Bickel. research statement, comparative models and experimental methods
The combination illustrates two different sources of evidence. Comparing documented syntactic dependencies across languages can reveal recurring patterns; an experiment can instead hold an input contrast fixed and measure processing in participants. These are examples of the questions those methods can address, rather than findings inferred from a biography.
Balthasar Bickel also co-developed the Leipzig Glossing Rules by Bernard Comrie and others with Bernard Comrie and Martin Haspelmath. Their shared conventions make linguistic annotation easier to compare while leaving grammatical analysis open to argument.[ref]
Leipzig Glossing Rules by Bernard Comrie and others. About the rules, developer credit and distinction between convention and analysis
Portrait of Balthasar Bickel
. Photograph linked from his official institutional profile. Bernard Comrie 2026-11-05
Bernard Comrie is a linguist specializing in linguistic typology and historical comparisons of languages. His research includes grammatical tense, grammatical voice and numeral systems, with fieldwork in geographically distant communities. His own account emphasizes examining many different kinds of language when assessing generalizations.[ref]
Research profile by Bernard Comrie. Specialization and autobiographical research statement
A simple methodological example shows why this matters. English can form a passive voice construction such as
The pump was repaired. Finding that construction in one language establishes a possibility, while a claim about all languages requires much wider evidence and explicit criteria for recognizing the relevant construction. This illustrates the difference between a description and a proposed cross-language generalization.Bernard Comrie co-developed the Leipzig Glossing Rules by Bernard Comrie and others with Martin Haspelmath and Balthasar Bickel. The conventions expose how a proposed analysis segments and labels an expression, helping other researchers evaluate it.[ref]
Leipzig Glossing Rules by Bernard Comrie and others. About the rules and developer credit
Portrait of Bernard Comrie
. Named headshot linked from his official institutional profile. Martin Haspelmath 2026-11-05
Martin Haspelmath is a linguist whose comparative research concerns diversity and recurring patterns in grammatical and lexical systems. He coedited the World Atlas of Language Structures, an important resource for linguistic typology, and studies how properties can be compared across languages.[ref]
Research profile by Martin Haspelmath. About me, comparative research and World Atlas of Language Structures coeditorship
The scientific challenge goes beyond collecting familiar grammatical labels. In an original toy comparison, suppose two descriptions use different names for constructions that both express a possessor. A cross-language count needs an explicit criterion for deciding whether their relevant properties match. Conversely, identical labels do not guarantee equivalent structures. A useful lexical database or grammatical comparison separates documented observations from the analyst's coding decisions.
Martin Haspelmath developed the Leipzig Glossing Rules by Bernard Comrie and others with Bernard Comrie and Balthasar Bickel. A standardized display of morphemes and their glosses helps readers inspect the evidence behind a comparative claim; it does not by itself establish that claim.[ref]
Leipzig Glossing Rules by Bernard Comrie and others. About the rules and basic principles of interlinear glossing

