Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 2 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a finite-dimensional algebra over an algebraically closed field, basic algebra means , so its simple modules are one-dimensional and occur once in the semisimple quotient of the regular module. A hereditary ring has every submodule of a projective module projective; equivalently its global dimension is at most one.
Choose representatives of the simple modules. Our Ext quiver convention gives one vertex for andWith primitive orthogonal idempotents , put and . Applying to givesThe restriction map from is zero since every map to a simple kills , and is projective. Thus the arrow multiplicity is . This specifies the orientation rather than silently replacing the quiver by its opposite.
Because is hereditary, is projective. Its semisimple top has copies of , where is the arrow multiplicity. Its projective cover therefore supplies an epimorphismThis splits by projectivity of . Its kernel is a summand contained in the radical of the source; projection onto that summand and Nakayama lemma force the kernel to be zero. HenceEvery arrow forces , so has no directed cycles.
Choose lifts in of bases of the arrow spaces. Send the vertices and arrows of the path algebra to these idempotents and lifts, multiplying paths in the order for consecutive arrows , . This defines an algebra homomorphism . It is surjective: vertices span , arrows span , and products show that paths of length span . Nilpotence of then gives all of .
Let be the number of directed paths starting at , including the length-zero path. Acyclicity gives the same recursion , with value one at a sink. Induction from sinks gives . ThereforeThe surjective homomorphism is an isomorphism. This proves the basic hereditary algebra path-algebra theorem:
For each connected component of the underlying unoriented graph, is a central idempotent. Paths never connect distinct components, so as a direct sum of two-sided ideals. To prove each is a block, let be any central idempotent. Modulo the arrow ideal it has coordinates . Commuting with an arrow and reducing modulo the square of that ideal gives . Thus these coordinates are constant on each component. If they are zero on a component, the restriction of there is a nilpotent idempotent, hence zero; if they are one, apply that argument to . Consequently