Bidirectional positioning repeatability concerns repeated arrivals at a commanded position using both approach directions. Retain the direction labels: the combined behavior can include both return-to-return scatter and a positioning reversal error. The manufacturer's method forms direction-specific means and spreads before reporting an axis-level summary over several targets.[ref]
How to Consistently Verify the Performance of Nanopositioning Motion Control Equipment by Physik Instrumente. Sections4.1–4.4, directional means and repeatability aggregation
For an original example, independently read the following errors at one target, in micrometres:The means are 0.2 and 1.2, and each direction has sample standard deviation . If a declared analysis pools all six observations, its sample variance decomposes exactly asHere the within-direction sum of squares is and the between-direction term is . Consequently,The larger pooled spread is mostly explained by approach direction. This is an original variance identity with a stated sample-standard-deviation convention, not a replacement definition for every manufacturer's repeatability tolerance.
A physical study repeatedly traverses the target from both sides and records final settled displacement with independent metrology. Report target positions, approach distances, order, load and environmental conditions. A directional mean difference may be almost invisible if only within-direction scatter is reported; pooling without direction labels hides its cause. Neither statistic alone establishes measurement accuracy, and one target does not characterize the full travel range.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.