Measurement precision describes agreement among repeated indications or measured values obtained under stated conditions. It is commonly characterized using a standard deviation, variance or coefficient of variation, which describe the observed spread. Measurement repeatability is precision under a particular restricted set of conditions; intermediate measurement precision and measurement reproducibility concern other specified conditions.[ref]
For an original balance example, take three repeat readings of a reference object: , and . Their arithmetic mean and sample standard deviation areSuppose the reference object's assigned mass is with standard uncertainty . The observed mean differs from that reference by , much more than the within-series scatter. These chosen readings therefore illustrate why close repeat readings do not establish agreement with a reference. They do not determine the true systematic offset from only three trials.
Measurement accuracy and measurement trueness answer different questions from precision. A common additive offset leaves the deviations , and hence , unchanged. Averaging more independent readings can reduce random uncertainty in the mean but does not by itself remove that common offset.[ref]
International vocabulary of metrology by JCGM. VIM3entry2.15 note4; entry2.14, trueness and systematic error
A useful physical study repeatedly removes and replaces the reference object while recording load procedure, environmental conditions and elapsed time. Specify which parts of the measurement were repeated: repeated display readings alone may omit placement variation or instrumental drift. The statistic describes the stated experiment, not an unconditional property of the instrument.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.