Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 40 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a finite bimatrix game, let be the two players' payoff matrices. A pair of mixed strategies is a Nash equilibrium ifHere is the probability simplex on the first player's pure actions, and similarly for . The two payoff matrices need not be negatives of each other. Nash's theorem asserts that every finite two-person game has an equilibrium in mixed strategies.
We prove it using the Brouwer gain-map proof of bimatrix equilibrium. Put , and define the positive pure-deviation gainsWrite , and defineEvery coordinate is nonnegative and each player's coordinates sum to one. The map is continuous, since the payoffs and positive-part function are continuous and both denominators are at least one. Thus is a continuous self-map of the nonempty compact convex set . The Brouwer fixed-point theorem supplies a fixed point .
At that fixed point the first coordinate equations give . Suppose . For every with , this makes , so . But averaging the payoff excess over the support givesa contradiction. Therefore , and every is zero. Each pure action has payoff at most , so every mixed deviation, being a convex combination of pure actions, has payoff at most too. The same argument for gives and excludes every unilateral deviation by the second player. The fixed point is therefore a Nash equilibrium, proving the stated theorem without a zero-sum assumption.