First the exit time has sufficiently many finite moments. Over any interval of length , a Brownian motion increment has probability of absolute size larger than . If the process is still inside , such an increment forces it to exit before the next interval endpoint. Independence of increments at deterministic times therefore gives
Thus almost surely and all its positive moments are finite. This justifies extracting moments from its transform rather than presupposing them.
For , put . The process
is a martingale, being the average of two exponential martingales for Brownian motion. Apply the optional stopping theorem at the bounded time . Since , the stopped values are bounded by . Continuity gives . Letting by the dominated convergence theorem yields
Hence the Laplace transform of symmetric Brownian interval-exit time is
The value at zero follows from almost-sure finiteness. Expanding the reciprocal gives
Compare with part (a), now applicable because of the geometric tail bound. The Brownian symmetric interval-exit moments are
Write and . Path continuity gives . Stop the martingale at the bounded stopping time and apply the optional stopping theorem:
By the monotone convergence theorem, , so almost surely. Path continuity then gives . The dominated convergence theorem for the bounded variables shows
Next stop the quartic Hermite polynomial martingale from part (a), again only at . Its expectation is zero, so
Monotone convergence proves , establishing the needed second-moment integrability before the final passage to the limit. Since and , dominated convergence gives
Consequently the Brownian symmetric interval-exit moments are
To obtain the Laplace transform of symmetric Brownian interval-exit time, put . The Exponential martingale for Brownian motion shows that
is a martingale with . Bounded-time stopping gives . Its stopped values are bounded by , so dominated convergence applies as . Since , it yields
Every use of stopping at has thus been justified through bounded stopping and an explicit integrability or domination argument.