For a countable family of subharmonic functions, a locally integrable pointwise supremum is subharmonic in the distributional derivative sense. Finite maxima preserve subharmonicity: approximate the maximum by the smooth convex coordinatewise increasing function , apply the chain rule after mollification, then pass to a local L1 norm convergence limit. The maxima increase to and are bounded in absolute value by on compact sets, so the dominated convergence theorem completes the proof. The hypothesis cannot be omitted: has infinite supremum. To obtain a pointwise subharmonic function, take the canonical representative of a subharmonic distribution.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 5 5 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a real locally integrable function, the definitions are distributional:Thus the Laplacian is respectively a positive distribution, a negative distribution, or zero. A superharmonic function is the negative of a subharmonic function; being both is equivalent to being harmonic. For a function these conditions are , , and pointwise.
An equivalence class does not itself specify point values. For the maximum principle use the canonical representative of a subharmonic distributionThese normalized integrals are ball averages. To justify this construction, first mollify : its smooth local regularizations satisfy . For any smooth subharmonic function, the spherical mean obeysThis follows by differentiating the spherical integral and applying the divergence theorem. Its ball mean also increases with radius: its derivative is times the spherical mean minus the ball mean. Local convergence of the regularizations passes the monotonicity of the ball means to . The decreasing-radius limit therefore exists, possibly as minus infinity at an exceptional point, and equals almost everywhere by the Lebesgue differentiation theorem. It is upper semicontinuous as the local infimum of continuous ball averages and satisfiesFor a superharmonic function use the corresponding lower semicontinuous representative and reverse the inequality.
For a distributionally harmonic function, the smooth regularizations are harmonic and have constant spherical means. A radial mollifier of integral one therefore reproduces them by averaging these means. At fixed interior radius , pass to the local limit to obtain almost everywhere on a smaller region. The right side is smooth and has zero distributional Laplacian, giving the smooth harmonic representative. This proves the relevant Weyl lemma. Changing a value at a single point can spoil a pointwise maximum principle, so the representative convention is essential.
If the canonical representative of a subharmonic distribution on a connected domain attains a finite global maximum at an interior point, it is constant. The ball mean inequality forces equality almost everywhere on a small ball around the maximum. The canonical representative then equals the maximum everywhere on that ball. The maximum set is open by this argument and closed by upper semicontinuity; connectedness makes it the whole domain.