Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 52 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use signature and covariant one-particle state normalization . The future scattering condition uses the outgoing asymptotic scalar field:As with the incoming condition, this is understood in suitably smeared scattering matrix elements, not as unrestricted pointwise strong convergence of interacting and free local operators.
The free incoming field has expansionThe creation operator defines , with , so . On the other hand, translation invariance givesMatching the stable one-particle state component in the asymptotic condition fixes the constant overlap. Choose its state phase so that it is real and nonnegative. ThenThe same stable particle appears in the outgoing description, with compatible one-particle phases. Thus is the squared overlap measured by wave-function renormalization.
Insert a complete set of four-momentum eigenstates between the fields. For , translation invariance and Hermiticity giveFor , reversing the time-ordered product gives the same sum with . Therefore, with continuous-state integrals implicit in the completeness sum,Here is the Heaviside step function.
For the usual spectral representation, take a Lorentz-invariant vacuum, a positive-norm Hilbert space and the future-cone spectrum condition. Also take , as for the unbroken real scalar field, or subtract this constant and use the connected correlation function. Otherwise the vacuum intermediate state adds a disconnected constant not represented by the ordinary mass-shell measure below.
Let for that centered field, and use the Fourier transform convention . Define the Källén–Lehmann spectral density by the distributional equalityLorentz invariance makes the weight on each future mass shell a function or measure of ; the spectrum condition gives . Its nonnegativity follows from the displayed squared matrix elements. ThusApplying time ordering to this expression mass shell by mass shell proves the Källén–Lehmann spectral representation:The factor is outside under the convention in the question.
The stable one-particle state part of completeness is . Its overlap is , so its contribution to is times the free mass- two-point function. HenceOther isolated particles as well as multiparticle states can belong to . The full scalar propagator accordingly has isolated pole , making its pole residue.
Finally use canonical field normalization: the canonical momentum is and the equal-time canonical commutation relation is . The vacuum commutator has the same spectral decomposition. For each free mass shell,independently of . Comparing with the interacting equal-time commutator gives the canonical scalar spectral sum rule:For the particle genuinely interpolated by the stated asymptotic field, ; the general nonnegative bound allows a field with zero overlap. The total weight and the upper bound require this canonical normalization and a well-defined distributional equal-time limit. They do not follow from the asymptotic condition alone: rescaling rescales both and the entire spectral measure.