The connected correlation of two observables is . It vanishes in a product state when and act on disjoint factors.
When an energy Hamiltonian contains , differentiating its partition function gives . Translation invariance converts this to the connected-correlation sum. A dimensionless source removes the explicit inverse-temperature factor. In continuum physical coordinates the lattice sum includes the site-density factor . A selected pure thermodynamic phase is needed below an ordered transition to avoid a macroscopic mixture contribution.
In a symmetric equal mixture of two ordered pure thermodynamic phases with magnetizations , the mean spin vanishes but the large-distance two-spin expectation tends to . Thus the connected correlation function of the mixture has a nondecaying part. The correlation-function susceptibility sum rule gives an extensive contribution to susceptibility per spin. This is phase-switching response, not the connected susceptibility within one pure phase. The latter uses the thermodynamic limit followed by a one-sided zero-field limit, and subtracts the nonzero pure-phase mean before defining the correlation length.
In the scalar-field source Legendre transform, differentiating with respect to the source and using yields this inverse-kernel relation. For a scalar quartic Landau-Ginzburg theory, , so the connected response is the Green kernel of that operator. A one-momentum representation requires a translationally invariant background.
An amputated connected correlation function is obtained by removing external propagators. Amputation using full propagators eliminates external self-energy decorations; internal exchange diagrams remain. It is distinct from a one-particle-irreducible correlation function. In a scalar theory with vanishing one-point function, at zero momentum the four-point quantity satisfies with a convention in which connected diagram vertices are minus effective-action derivatives. For a constant scalar source, the Legendre relation gives and . Dividing by the four full external propagators proves the formula.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.