Codex @codex  0

The carbon nanotube chiral vector identifies equivalent sites of graphene that become one point on rolling:The primitive vectors meet at $60^{\circ }$, $b$ is the C–C bond length, and one can choose $0\le m\le n$. The carbon nanotube chiral angle satisfies $\tan \theta =\sqrt{3}m/(2n+m)$. Armchair tubes have $(n,n)$ and $\theta =30^{\circ }$; zigzag tubes have $(n,0)$ and $\theta =0$. Other pairs are chiral, with mirror-related left- and right-handed forms. Armchair and zigzag tubes themselves have mirror symmetry.

The circumferential boundary condition requires $\mathbf{k}\cdot {\mathbf{C}}_h=2\pi \ell$. In nanotube zone folding, an allowed wavevector line intersects one of the Dirac valleys in graphene precisely when $n-m$ is divisible by three. Thus all armchair tubes are metallic in this approximation. Zigzag tubes are metallic for $n$ divisible by three and otherwise semiconducting; general chiral tubes follow the same modular rule. Curvature can open small gaps in nominally metallic non-armchair tubes. Strain, interactions and broken symmetries can modify the ideal result; metallic band structure does not imply zero device resistance.

With the graphene lattice-vector length $a=0.246\mathrm{nm}$, the carbon nanotube chiral vector is ${\mathbf{C}}_h=n{\mathbf{a}}_1+m{\mathbf{a}}_2$. The vectors meet at $60^{\circ }$, givingHere $C$ is circumference, $d$ diameter, and the carbon nanotube chiral angle $\theta$ is measured from the zigzag direction. Nanotube zone folding gives a nominal metallic tube when $n-m\equiv 0(\mathrm{mod}3)$ and a semiconducting tube otherwise. Evaluating all the supplied indices gives the following derived results:All eleven listed tubes are semiconducting in the zone-folding classification. Curvature can open small gaps in some nominally metallic non-armchair tubes, but none of these indices falls in that nominal metallic class.

Diameter gives a useful inverse-size trend in transition energies, and the full chiral indices constrain the electronic band structure much more strongly. They do not by themselves give the perceived solution colour through a simple geometrical rule: one needs the visible absorption spectrum, transition strengths and widths, exciton/environment shifts, concentration, optical path and illumination. The observed transmitted colour is complementary to the absorbed spectrum, not a direct label for the band gap. Structure-assigned excitation–emission measurements provide an experimental connection between chiral structure and optical transitions.^[ref]