Carlos A. Driscoll 2026-11-05
Carlos A. Driscoll studies the evolutionary relationships and domestication of cats using genetic evidence. In a 2007 study, Driscoll and colleagues compared 979 domestic cats and wildcats sampled across different geographical populations.[ref]
The analysis combined variation in microsatellites with mitochondrial genomes. These provide complementary ancestry signals: the mitochondrial genome traces a maternal lineage, while the sampled nuclear DNA markers capture additional relationships. The study found domestic cats genetically close to sampled Near Eastern wildcats and used this pattern to infer an origin associated with that region.[ref]
The motivating comparison is more informative than similarity in appearance alone. If domestic animals group with one regional wild population across genetic markers, that supplies evidence about ancestry. It does not by itself determine the exact place, date or cultural sequence of domestication; those historical questions also depend on sampling and other kinds of evidence.
Wildcat 2026-11-05
A wildcat in the narrower zoological usage is one of the closely related wild Felis lineages resembling the domestic cat. Current Cat Specialist Group taxonomy distinguishes the European wildcat, Felis silvestris, from the Afro-Asiatic wildcat, Felis lybica, and from the domestic cat, Felis catus. Older literature sometimes grouped several of these lineages within a broadly defined Felis silvestris. A feral cat is a free-living domestic cat, so living without human care does not alone identify an animal as a wildcat.[ref]
Genetic markers can investigate ancestry beyond outward resemblance. A 2007 study by Carlos A. Driscoll and collaborators assessed 979 domestic and wild cats, comparing microsatellites and DNA sequences from mitochondria. The sampled domestic lineages clustered closely with Near Eastern wildcats. The paper's own subspecies names should be read in its historical classification, rather than silently replaced with a modern species list.[ref]
The comparison separates two questions: what ancestry the sampled animals share, and what taxonomic rank to assign each lineage. Hybridization with domestic cats can further complicate identification, making one coat pattern or one inherited marker an incomplete description of an individual animal.