A blackbody absorbs all incident radiation and, in thermal equilibrium, emits the Planck law spectrum with integrated flux . Earth reflects some incoming sunlight, while its surface and atmosphere absorb and emit selectively with wavelength. With solar irradiance and Bond albedo A, the equilibrium planetary effective radiating temperature is
Reflection lowers this temperature relative to the zero-albedo value. The greenhouse effect makes the surface warmer than the effective emitting temperature: in a simple diagnostic , . This effective emissivity summarizes atmospheric transfer, not a universal material constant. At fixed absorbed sunlight, greenhouse warming does not require a different equilibrium outgoing flux. [ref]
The stated is positive net energy uptake, not necessarily the imposed radiative forcing itself. A linear climate forcing-response energy balance is
Here F is the perturbing forcing, is the net stabilizing radiative response and C is an effective areal heat capacity. The residual heats the Earth system, mainly through ocean heat uptake, with additional storage and melting. Finite heat capacity and ocean exchange delay equilibration. The imbalance alone determines neither F, the warming rate without C, nor the eventual equilibrium warming . Feedbacks change the response coefficient. The given number is treated as the examination's premise, not a present-day observational estimate. [ref]
Use spectral radiant exitance per unit wavelength. The Planck law is
A hotter blackbody radiates more at every wavelength, its wavelength peak moves to shorter wavelengths according to Wien's displacement law, and its integrated flux rises as by the Stefan–Boltzmann law. The wavelength convention matters: a spectrum plotted per unit frequency has a different peak transformation.
Figure 1.
Illustrative wavelength spectra: a hotter blackbody has a larger total flux and a shorter peak wavelength
. Source. Details.
For planetary equilibrium temperature, assume an isotropic blackbody star, a circular orbit, negligible internal heating, unit surface thermal emissivity and efficient global heat redistribution so the surface has one temperature. The received stellar irradiance is . A planet of radius intercepts but radiates over , giving the projected-area factor in planetary energy balance
Without the uniform-temperature assumption, this calculation gives , not a unique arithmetic mean of surface temperature.
With Bond albedo , the absorbed fraction is . Hence
a decrease of approximately . This albedo weights incident stellar light and does not imply thermal emissivity .
Define the planetary effective emissivity by outgoing top-of-atmosphere flux . Maintaining the same absorbed stellar power with gives
The greenhouse effect allows thermal radiation to escape from colder layers, so the outgoing flux is less than a black surface at would emit. Downward atmospheric emission contributes to the surface energy balance; this does not violate the top-of-atmosphere energy balance.[ref]
A single-layer greenhouse model makes the distinction quantitative. Take a shortwave-transparent, isothermal layer with infrared absorptivity and emissivity , above a surface black in the thermal infrared. Writing , its surface and atmospheric balances are
For , . Radiation escaping to space is , so
Thus is the planet's effective emissivity; is the layer's infrared emissivity within this particular model. They are not interchangeable. Real atmospheres require wavelength-dependent absorption, a vertical temperature profile and nonradiative heat transport; the measured temperatures alone do not uniquely retrieve an atmospheric optical profile.
The solar flux at Earth is . A spherical Earth intercepts sunlight over its cross section but radiates over its whole surface, giving
This is below the observed mean surface temperature. Atmospheric infrared absorption and emission produce a greenhouse effect that raises the surface temperature relative to the effective radiating temperature. Including reflected sunlight alone would lower the estimate further; albedo does not explain a warmer surface.[ref]