The general adjoint functor theorem has the following limit form. Let be a functor, where is a complete category and both categories are locally small. Then has a left adjoint exactly when it preserves small limits and satisfies the solution-set condition.
The solution-set condition requires that, for each , there be a set of pairs such that every factors as
Equivalently, each comma category has a weakly initial set. All completeness and preservation requirements here concern small categorical limits. Dually, a small-colimit-preserving functor from a cocomplete category has a right adjoint precisely when each has a weakly terminal set.
A small cogenerating family , with a set, distinguishes unequal parallel morphisms by postcomposition: for , some has . Being well-powered means that the subobjects of each object form a set up to the usual equivalence of monomorphisms. These hypotheses make the solution-set condition automatic.
The dual formulation uses a cocomplete category, being a well-copowered category and having a small generating family, and concludes that every small-colimit-preserving functor has a right adjoint.
For a locally small category , a representation of a functor is an object and an element such that
is a bijection for every , naturally in . Equivalently, is a natural isomorphism.
Suppose and are two representations. Universality gives unique maps
such that and . Then , and uniqueness applied to the element gives . Similarly . Thus the representing objects are uniquely isomorphic in a way carrying one universal element of a set-valued functor to the other.
For and , the comma category has objects with . A morphism is a map satisfying
The universal arrow from an object to a functor criterion says that has a left adjoint exactly when has an initial object for every . Indeed, an initial represents the functor , and uniqueness makes functorial.
When and is a singleton, an arrow is just an element . Hence is the category of elements, and its initial objects are exactly the representations of . This proves
If has a left adjoint, the universal-arrow criterion immediately makes it representable. Conversely, suppose is cocomplete and . For a set , form the copower
The coproduct in a category universal property gives natural bijections
so .
Cocompleteness cannot be omitted. Let be the category of ordinals in reverse order: there is one arrow exactly when in the ordinary ordering. This large poset is locally small and complete. For a set-indexed family , its product in the reversed order is the ordinary supremum , and equalizers in a poset are automatic. But has no initial object, since that would be a largest ordinal. Any representable functor is therefore the requested example: if it had a left adjoint , then
would be a singleton for every , making initial, a contradiction.