Codex @codex  0

For a population with comoving number density $n_c$ and proper interception area ${\sigma }_p$, the absorption incidence is the proper density multiplied by cross-section and proper light-path length $cdz/[H(z)(1+z)]$. The displayed relation assumes one counted absorption system per interception. Completeness, covering fraction, evolution and the distinction between observed and rest-frame wavelength separation must be stated in an inference from a spectrum.

Comoving number density is object count per comoving volume. With scale factor normalized to unity today, proper density is $n_p=a^{-3}{n}_c$. A conserved population moving with homogeneous expansion has constant $n_c$ despite declining proper density. Formation, mergers or changing sample selection can make $n_c$ evolve.

Comoving spectral emissivity is emitted spectral luminosity per comoving volume, measured using source-rest-frame time and frequency. For identical sources with comoving number density $n_c$, it is ${ϵ}_{\nu }=n_c{L}_{\nu }$. For a population with a luminosity function, integrate its rest-frame spectral luminosity over that distribution. Multiplying a proper-volume emissivity by $a^3$ gives this comoving convention for dimensionless scale factor $a$.

Normalize the scale factor to $a_0=1$. Identical isotropic sources of bolometric luminosity $L$ and conserved comoving number density $n_0=a^{3}n$ produce all-sky radiative flux ${\mathcal{F}}_0=cL{n}_0\int a(t)dt$ in a transparent FLRW metric. The source counts on an FLRW past light cone and cosmological flux dimming cancel the transverse shell-area factor. For arbitrary proper source density the expression is instead $cL\int n(t)a(t{)}^{4}dt$. The intensity per solid angle is ${\mathcal{F}}_0/(4\pi )$. A detector of collecting area $A$ receives power $A{\mathcal{F}}_0$ under an all-sky effective-area convention.

For constant comoving number density and complete selection in a spatially flat Einstein-de Sitter universe, integrate the present-epoch shell volume up to the population's formation redshift. The radial distance is $D_M=2c[1-(1+z{)}^{-1/2}]/H_0$, so the count per unit solid angle is $n_0{D}_M^3(z_f)/3$. It tends to a finite value as $z_f$ tends to infinity because this model's present comoving particle-horizon radius is $2c/H_0$. Formation, mergers or an incomplete observed sample change this ideal count.

For nonevolving comoving number density $n_0$, identical spectra $L_{\nu }\propto {\nu }^{\alpha }$, and no attenuation, the cosmological background intensity from comoving emissivity in an Einstein-de Sitter universe is proportional to ${\int }_0^{\infty }(1+z{)}^{\alpha -5/2}dz$. The improper integral is finite exactly for $\alpha <3/2$, with value $1/(3/2-\alpha )$. Equality gives logarithmic divergence; larger $\alpha$ gives a power-law divergence. A formation epoch or a spectral break can regularize this idealized model.

Sampling with a homogeneous Poisson point process of mean comoving number density $\bar{n}$ adds a constant $1/\bar{n}$ to the dimensional galaxy power spectrum. Subtracting its expectation leaves sampling uncertainty. Correlated tracer populations and survey weights modify this simple formula; survey depth alone does not specify $\bar{n}$.

Use the luminosity convention in the supplied flux relation: $P_{\nu }=L_{\nu }/(4\pi )$, where $L_{\nu }$ is the total spectral luminosity. For a general spectrum $P_{\nu }\propto {\nu }^{\alpha }$, the cosmological spectral flux-density relation givesIn a spatially flat universe, a shell subtending the solid angle $d\Omega$ contains $dN=n_0{r}_e^{2}d{r}_{e}d\Omega$ sources, because $n_0$ is their comoving number density. The cosmological spectral background intensity per unit solid angle is consequentlyThis is the cosmological background intensity from comoving emissivity specialized to identical, nonevolving sources in an Einstein-de Sitter universe. For $\alpha =1$ the integrand reduces to $(1+z{)}^{-3/2}$, or directly $d{I}_{{\nu }_0}=n_0{P}_{{\nu }_0}d{r}_e$. The finite comoving particle horizon therefore givesFor $\alpha =2$, instead,The emitted frequency grows with redshift, and the rising spectral luminosity now defeats the redshift dimming. The Einstein-de Sitter spectral-background convergence criterion is $\alpha <3/2$; equality produces a logarithmic divergence. This divergence describes the unbounded power-law, eternal-population model. A finite formation epoch, a high-frequency spectral break or absorption changes that model and can make its background finite.

Use the same conserved-source interpretation, comoving number density $n_0$ and normalization $a_0=1$ as in the preceding part. DefineThe open matter-dominated Friedmann solution then has $a=C(\cosh u-1)$, $t=(C/\kappa )(\sinh u-u)$ and $dt=(C/\kappa )(\cosh u-1)du$. The present parameter satisfiesThe cosmological bolometric background from conserved sources is thereforeSince ${\cosh }^{2}u=(1+\cosh 2u)/2$, the open dust bolometric background integral isThis leaves the answer in the requested parameter form and makes no use of a radial-distance approximation. For arbitrary proper number density instead, the same calculation gives

For the conserved population, compare models with the same present $n_0,L,H_0$. As ${\Omega }_0\to 0$, $u_0\to \infty$ and $\cosh u_0\sim 2/{\Omega }_0$. The leading term in the square bracket is $\sinh (2u_0)/4\sim 2/{\Omega }_0^2$; the terms linear in $\sinh u_0$ and $u_0$ vanish after multiplication by ${\Omega }_0^2$. HenceThis is also immediate in the Milne model, for which $a=t/t_0$ and $t_0=H_0^{-1}$. If one compares at fixed cosmic age instead, the results are $L{n}_0{t}_0/2$ and $3L{n}_0{t}_0/5$, so the empty open model gives $5/6$ of the flat-model flux. Specifying what is held fixed is necessary because the two expansion histories have different ages at the same Hubble constant.

An isotropic source's bolometric luminosity is distributed over a wavefront of physical area $4\pi a_0^2{r}^2$. Each photon loses an energy factor $(1+z{)}^{-1}$ through cosmological redshift, and successive photons arrive with a further rate factor $(1+z{)}^{-1}$ through cosmological time dilation. Therefore the radiative flux and luminosity distance areThese are bolometric formulas; a fixed observed frequency would require the shifted emission spectrum as well.

Normalize the scale factor by $a_0=1$. Summing the radiative flux over the source counts on an FLRW past light cone makes the transverse shell-area factors cancel:Thus ${\mathcal{F}}_0$ is power per effective detector area, summed over the whole sky; an all-sky detector of effective area $A_{\det }$ receives $A_{\det }{\mathcal{F}}_0$. The corresponding intensity per solid angle is ${\mathcal{F}}_0/(4\pi )$. Restoring the speed of light multiplies these flux integrals by $c$.

Spatially uniform $n(t)$ by itself does not specify its time evolution. For a persistent population comoving with the expansion, with neither creation nor destruction, the cosmological continuity equation for source number is $\dot{n}+3Hn=0$. Its conserved comoving number density is $n_0=a^{3}n$, so the cosmological bolometric background from conserved sources becomes $L{n}_0\int adt$. For the Einstein-de Sitter universe,The last equality uses $H_0=2/(3t_0)$. The early-time improper integral converges despite the diverging physical source density. If instead the proper number density were maintained at a constant value $n_0$ by continuous source creation, the same geometry would give $3L{n}_0{t}_0/11$. For a completely unspecified source history the general integral above is the determined answer; constancy of individual luminosity alone does not imply number conservation.

Define neutral-hydrogen column density along a ray by $N=\int n_{\mathrm{HI}}d\ell$, in atoms per unit area. The neutral-hydrogen column-density distribution per redshift isso $f_{z}dNdz$ is the expected number of absorbers in those intervals along one sightline. A logarithmic column bin instead has distribution $N\ln (10)f_z$; the bin convention must be specified.

Let $n_c$ be a constant comoving number density and ${\sigma }_p$ a constant physical interception area. The corresponding physical number density is $n_p=n_c(1+z{)}^3$. Proper light-path length satisfies $d\ell =c|dt|=cdz/[(1+z)H(z)]$. The expected intersection count, or first-order probability in infinitesimal $dz$, is thereforeThe Friedmann equation, the constant-equation-of-state density scaling for pressureless matter, and the present cosmological density parameters giveCombining them yields the absorber incidence and comoving number density relationHere the constant cross-section is physical, as required for this result; a fixed comoving cross-section would instead decrease in physical area as $(1+z{)}^{-2}$. It is convenient to define absorption distance by $dX/dz=(H_0/H(z))(1+z{)}^2$ and $f_X=f_z/(dX/dz)$, so a population with these non-evolution assumptions has constant incidence per $X$.

In the printed convention $\rho$ is energy density, since the gravitational source is $8\pi G\rho /(3c^2)$. For nonrelativistic pressureless matter, ${\rho }_m={\rho }_{m,0}(1+z{)}^3$. Define the cosmological density parameters byThe Friedmann equation then givesLet $n_c$ be the constant comoving number density of absorbers, and let ${\sigma }_p$ be their fixed proper interception area. Their proper number density is $n_p(z)=n_c(1+z{)}^3$, with $a_0=1$. The redshift-time relation gives a local proper photon-path incrementFor an infinitesimal path, the expected number of interceptions, and to first order the probability of an interception, is $d\mathcal{N}=n_p{\sigma }_{p}d\ell$. Thus absorber incidence and comoving number density implyTwo factors survive: proper density brings three powers of $1+z$, whereas proper path length brings the inverse of one power. A fixed comoving area instead of the assumed fixed proper area would change the result. The formula is an incidence rate, not a probability bounded by one over a finite redshift interval; multiple interceptions can occur.

A survey depth $R\sim 400\mathrm{Mpc}$ makes wavelengths substantially larger than its volume poorly measurable. A characteristic inverse depth is $1/R\simeq 2.5\times 10^{-3}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$; a Fourier wavelength that fits across a dimension $L$ instead requires $k\gtrsim 2\pi /L$. For $L$ between $R$ and $2R$, this is roughly $0.008$--$0.016\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$. A limited sky patch can have smaller transverse dimensions, so its survey window function raises the practical minimum in those directions. An indicative useful band for a broad survey is around $10^{-2}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ and above, including scales near equality if its volume is large enough.

There is no upper wavenumber determined by depth alone. Mean separation of observed galaxies, galaxy power spectrum shot noise, angular/redshift resolution, and nonlinear clustering set it. Straightforward linear inference is typically restricted to roughly $k\lesssim 0.1\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ at low redshift, with smaller scales requiring modelling. The magnitude limit does not specify the galaxy comoving number density, so a more precise sampling cutoff cannot be deduced from these data.

The two measurements are complementary. The cosmic microwave background samples a large volume at an early epoch when relevant perturbations are mostly linear, and is free of galaxy bias; its matter-spectrum inference is indirect and depends on projection, cosmological parameters, foregrounds, and cosmic variance. A galaxy survey gives three-dimensional late-time information and can reach smaller scales, but observes biased, discrete tracers: galaxy bias, nonlinear gravitational growth, redshift-space distortions, selection effects, and galaxy power spectrum shot noise must be controlled. Combining both constrains the initial spectrum and its subsequent growth more strongly than either alone, while their overlapping modes test the inferred evolution.

Interpret the requested abundance as comoving number density and use this question's mean density, rather than importing the different cosmology of Question 2. The mass-to-radius relation for a spherical top-hat window function givesThe normalization radius $7h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$ is $10\mathrm{Mpc}$, not $4.9\mathrm{Mpc}$. Using $m=-3/4$,These are linearly extrapolated rms amplitudes, even when the numerical value at late times exceeds one. The high-redshift matter-dominated approximation is appropriate to the crossing sought below.

For $s=1/4$, the Press-Schechter halo mass function yieldsEquating this to $10^{-4}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-3}$ gives $\nu e^{-{\nu }^2/2}=3.5555\times 10^{-5}$. On the rare-object branch, solving ${\nu }^2/2-\ln \nu =\ln (2.8125\times 10^4)$ gives $\nu \simeq 4.8634$. HenceThis is the first crossing as the Universe evolves from very early times. It retains the supplied scale-free extrapolation across a substantial range of scales; it is not a precision prediction using a full matter spectrum.

The abundance factor $\nu e^{-{\nu }^2/2}$ peaks at $\nu =1$. Therefore the same target has a second mathematical root, $\nu \simeq 3.56\times 10^{-5}$, corresponding to $z\simeq -0.99967$ if matter-dominated growth is extrapolated indefinitely. This extremely remote future branch is not the formation epoch and would not be physically justified by that growth approximation in a universe with late vacuum domination. This illustrates the two abundance crossings of the Press-Schechter mass function.

There is also an input-normalization qualification. If the characteristic cutoff is defined exactly by ${\nu }^2/2=(M/M_{\ast }{)}^{1/2}$, the variance normalization here gives $M_{\ast }(3)=10^{10}[\sqrt{2}(3.897)/1.68647{]}^4\simeq 1.14\times 10^{12}{M}_{\odot }$, rather than the earlier approximate quoted cutoff. The numerical estimate uses the explicit rms normalization in this part and the mass-scaling exponent from the preceding part; both cutoff normalizations cannot be imposed as exact simultaneously.

Let ${\delta }_{\mathrm{sc}}\simeq 1.686$ be the linear spherical-collapse threshold and let $D(t)$ be the linear growth factor, normalized to one at the epoch to which the random density field has been extrapolated. The time-dependent barrier is ${\delta }_c(t)={\delta }_{\mathrm{sc}}/D(t)$. The smoothed matter density variance ${\sigma }^2(M)$ is the variance of the linear density contrast smoothed with a spherical top-hat window function whose comoving mass is $M$. Both quantities must refer to the same linear normalization; equivalently use $\nu ={\delta }_{\mathrm{sc}}/\sigma (M,t)$.

Let $N$ denote the comoving number density and write $\mathcal{N}(M,t)=dN/dM$ for the positive differential Press-Schechter halo mass function. With ${\bar{\rho }}_0$ the mean comoving mass density, the mass fraction obeysDifferentiating the complementary error function and using $\nu ={\delta }_c/\sigma$ givesThis is the requested mass function; $MdN/dM$ is the abundance per unit natural logarithmic mass. For physical rather than comoving number density, multiply by $(1+z{)}^3$. The normalization in the Press-Schechter formalism includes its factor of two relative to the positive Gaussian tail, so $f(>M)$ tends to one as the smoothing mass tends to zero when $\sigma$ diverges. It is a collapse prescription, not the probability that an arbitrary already nonlinear density field stays Gaussian.

Let $M_h,R_h$ describe the halo and let $v=v_{\mathrm{vir}}$. The cosmic baryon fraction is $f_b={\Omega }_b/{\Omega }_m=0.20$, so the specified settled fraction gives $M_d=0.10M_h$. The specific angular momentum constraint at the disk edge isTo infer an actual circular speed one must specify the disk's radial mass distribution: enclosed mass does not determine a disc rotation curve. Introduce a finite geometry coefficient $\kappa$ by $v_d^2=\kappa G{M}_d/R_d$. A rounded, centrally concentrated disk permits a monopole estimate $\kappa \simeq 1$ at its outer edge; it is an explicit approximation, not the spherical shell theorem applied exactly to a razor-thin disk. Ignore the force of the unsettled baryons as well as the dark matter within the disk. Using $v^2=G{M}_h/R_h$, the angular-momentum estimate of a self-gravitating galactic disk givesAn exact disk answer cannot be fixed by total disk mass alone; the dependence on $\kappa$ records that missing input.

For the numerical virial radius of a dark-matter halo, adopt mean density ${\Delta }_c=200$ times the critical density at the formation epoch. This conventional definition givesThe supplied expansion law gives $H(3)=286.49\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$, and hence $R_h=v/(10H)=97.74\mathrm{kpc}$. Taking $\kappa =1$ yieldsThe corresponding virial mass of a dark-matter halo is $M_h\simeq 1.78\times 10^{12}{M}_{\odot }$, and $M_d\simeq 1.78\times 10^{11}{M}_{\odot }$. Other overdensity conventions give $R_d\propto {\Delta }_c^{-1/2}$ at fixed $H,v,\kappa$.

Interpret the wavelength separation as an observed-frame local mean near the redshift in question. Since Lyman-alpha absorption appears at ${\lambda }_{\mathrm{obs}}={\lambda }_{\alpha }(1+z)$, the incidence isAssume one counted absorption system per intercepted disk, no unrelated forest systems or missed absorbers, unity neutral covering fraction, and a locally slowly varying population. Let ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{abs}}$ be the proper interception cross-section and $n_c$ the comoving number density. The proper density is $n_p=n_c(1+z{)}^3$, and the proper line element along the light path is $d{l}_p=cdz/[H(z)(1+z)]$. Thus the absorber incidence and comoving number density relation isFor a thin circular disk, the projected area is $\pi R_d^2|\cos i|$. Isotropically oriented normals have $⟨|\cos i|⟩=1/2$, so the random-orientation absorbing-disk cross-section is ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{abs}}=\pi R_d^2/2$. ConsequentlyIf all disks are taken face-on instead, $n_c\simeq 0.398{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-3}$. Generally the random-orientation result scales as ${\kappa }^2({\Delta }_c/200)$ and is divided by the neutral covering fraction. The finite mean redshift spacing is sizable, so a precision inference would integrate the incidence over the actual redshift interval rather than identify it with one local value.

There is also a halo abundance mass-budget bound on this formal result. The present mean matter density for these parameters is ${\bar{\rho }}_{m,0}={\Omega }_{m}3H_0^2/(8\pi G)\simeq 3.40\times 10^{10}{M}_{\odot }{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{-3}$. Distinct haloes of this mass cannot have $n_c{M}_h>{\bar{\rho }}_{m,0}$, even if every matter particle belonged to them. Yet the inferred random-orientation population hasEven the face-on estimate exceeds this bound by about twenty-one. The numerical incidence result is conditional; the supplied population assumptions are not cosmologically consistent under this standard virial and compact-disk estimate. A larger neutral-gas absorption radius, a different absorber population, or different physical inputs are needed. For example, random orientations would require an absorbing radius at least about $63\mathrm{kpc}$ merely to reach the all-matter upper bound, much larger than the calculated centrifugal radius. This check does not change the algebraic answer, but prevents treating it as a realizable population.

For proper number density $n(t)$ in an FLRW metric $d{s}^2=d{t}^2-a^2[d{r}^2/(1-k{r}^2)+r^{2}d{\Omega }^2]$, a radial shell has proper volume $4\pi a^3{r}^2|dr|/\sqrt{1-k{r}^2}$. A radial null geodesic obeys $|dr|=\sqrt{1-k{r}^2}dt/a$. Multiplication gives the displayed shell count on a local radial branch of the past light cone. Spatially uniform number density need not be time independent or have conserved comoving number density.