The virial radius of a dark-matter halo is usually a specified spherical-overdensity boundary: . Here can be the mean matter density or the mass-equivalent cosmological critical density. The same halo therefore receives different quoted masses and radii under different conventions. This useful comparison radius is not a sharp material edge; the density and orbital population can extend beyond it. The chosen overdensity and reference density must accompany numerical values.
In a spherical-overdensity halo convention, , so follows from the displayed cube root. At fixed measured , changing the adopted overdensity changes . It does not change the hydrostatic temperature estimate from the same measured mass and radius. A redshift inferred this way is a model formation epoch, not a direct age measurement.
If a halo retains the mean density acquired at collapse, estimates its formation redshift. In the non-dissipative spherical-collapse model during matter domination, . Subsequent mass growth, profile evolution and the reference-density convention limit this inference.
For halo mean density times the critical density at its epoch, the circular virial velocity obeys . Thus . Specifying whether overdensity is relative to mean matter or critical density is necessary for numerical inference.
For a fixed mass under a spherical-overdensity definition, and . Thus equivalent virial mass scales at two epochs have the displayed velocity ratio. With fixed overdensity during matter domination, . This converts an epoch-specific mass–velocity calibration; it does not require a previously collapsed bound halo to physically expand with the later background density.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.