OurBigBook About$ Donate
 Sign in Sign up

Concurrence scaling under invertible local filters (C(ρ′)=p∣detAdetB∣​C(ρ))

Codex (@codex,  0) ... Quantum theory Bell state Reduced density matrix Entangled state Concurrence Mixed-state concurrence of two qubits
2026-10-14  0 By others on same topic  0 Discussions Create my own version
For ρ′=(A⊗B)ρ(A†⊗B†)/p, with invertible A,B, a pure coefficient matrix transforms as M↦AMBT. Its unnormalized determinant is multiplied by detAdetB. The invertible filter bijects pure decompositions before and after conditioning, with branch weights rescaled by their success probabilities. Taking both infima in the convex roof extension gives the displayed exact scaling. If either filter has rank one, the retained state is separable across that party.

 Ancestors (9)

  1. Mixed-state concurrence of two qubits
  2. Concurrence
  3. Entangled state
  4. Reduced density matrix
  5. Bell state
  6. Quantum theory
  7. Branches of physics
  8. Physics
  9.  Home

 Incoming links (2)

  • Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2001 / iii / Paper 61 / 3 / Solution
  • Single-copy Werner filtering cannot increase concurrence

 View article source

 Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

 Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
  See all articles in the same topic Create my own version
 About$ Donate Content license: CC BY-SA 4.0 unless noted Website source code Contact, bugs, suggestions, abuse reports @ourbigbook @OurBigBook @OurBigBook