Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 80 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use an inertial gravity-current box model in a horizontal prismatic V-shaped valley. Let its section have area and width , where the dimensionless constant is half-width divided by depth. Let be front position and the representative uniform current depth. Assume negligible entrainment and volume loss, hydrostatic cross-sections, large Reynolds number, and negligible bed friction and axial bed slope. These assumptions describe the bulk spreading after the short dam-break adjustment; they do not give a universal law for a steep or friction-dominated valley.
For water of fixed volume , conservation gives . Close the front speed by the gravity-current front condition , where is a constant order-one Froude number for the chosen inertial front model. ThereforeIntegration gives . Once the initial reservoir length is negligible, the inertial dam-break current in a triangular valley satisfiesThe time exponent differs from a flat-bottomed channel because a V-shaped section stores volume proportional to . A viscous V-shaped channel gravity current obeys a different spreading law, so retaining the inertial assumption is essential.
For the short-lived eruption, interpret as the bulk mixture volume released during the event. Let be the well-mixed particle volume fraction, initially , let and be particle and ambient carrier densities, and assume a dilute Boussinesq approximation for the mixture. The particles provide reduced gravityAssume thermal buoyancy, compressibility, erosion and continued injection are negligible, and that the carrier volume remains . Turbulent mixing keeps the particles suspended uniformly while they settle vertically at a constant terminal settling velocity . For small spherical particles of radius in carrier viscosity , the Stokes settling velocity is when the particle Reynolds number is small. If an eruption volume is quoted as solid particle volume rather than mixture volume, replace the used here by that volume divided by .
The particle deposition flux per horizontal projected bed area is . The current's projected settling area is , soThe factor two reflects the triangular section's mean depth . Put and . The front and concentration balances becomeTaking the initial release length negligible compared with the final runout, integration yields the constant-settling runout in a triangular valley:In particular at fixed valley shape and front coefficient. With a finite initial length, replace by in the corresponding integrated relation.
The whole time dependence is determined analytically by the quadratureEarly spreading has , the water law with replaced by . At late times the concentration loss slows the flow, and decays exponentially with rate , where . The final length is a limiting runout reached as , not a finite-time stopping event in this ideal model.
To calculate the deposit profile of a finite triangular-valley particle current, let be final deposited particle mass per unit downstream length, and the initial particle mass. Deposition at a fixed section starts at arrival time , when the front first reaches . With the instantaneous front coordinate denoted , use to obtainWriting , this evaluates toand beyond . The profile decreases downstream, vanishes quadratically at the runout, and obeys . This integral check ensures that all initially suspended particle mass is accounted for.
For an areal rather than a linear deposit density, the changing valley width must also be specified. At lateral coordinate , the current covers the bed only while . Set , with on the valley axis. The mass per horizontal projected bed area is zero if , and otherwise isOn the axis this reduces to . Divide projected areal density by to obtain mass per actual sloping bed area. A specified packed deposit density then converts this areal mass to local deposit thickness; the spreading model itself predicts deposited mass, not a packing fraction.