The equality can fail even at . Inside the constructible universe, is countable, so its definable power set is countable. The constructible power set of is uncountable there by the Cantor theorem. A real outside remains a constructible subset of , hence belongs to . The cardinal comparison must be made inside , since its reals can be externally countable.
One can take . Finite induction gives for every finite : every subset of a finite level is definable using its finitely many elements as parameters. Hence , the set of hereditarily finite sets.
Now reason inside the constructible universe , a model of ZFC. The set is countable there, and there are countably many first-order formulas and finite parameter tuples. Thus is countable in . But the constructible power set is uncountable in by the Cantor theorem. Choose
This is constructible and a subset of , so and . Therefore
All comparisons were made inside ; this avoids assuming that the constructible reals are uncountable in the ambient universe. The witness remains valid externally because the two structures use the same , the same , and the same constructible level. Thus constructible sets of low rank can appear at later stages.
The definable power set performs one definability step over the single structure , whereas the constructible power set contains subsets of created at arbitrarily late stages of the constructible hierarchy.
For the concrete case , there are only countably many first-order formulas and finite tuples of natural-number parameters, so is a countable set. In contrast, the constructible universe satisfies ZFC, and Cantor theorem makes its full power set uncountable inside . Consequently
so the two notions do not agree in general.