Contraction of a topological space 2026-10-06
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 3 20F d Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
For the pair from part (c), every simplex of dimension below lies in . Consequently the relative simplicial chain complex haswhere the degree- generator is the class of . Its relative boundary is zero because every codimension-one face lies in . All differentials therefore vanish, andThis is the relative homology of a simplex and its boundary. Equivalently, the long exact sequence in relative homology, together with the fact that is a contractible space and the homology of a sphere , gives the reduced homology identification .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 iii Paper 115 1 d Solution 2026-09-28
Real line bundles over a paracompact space are classified byEuclidean space is a contractible space, so its first cohomology vanishes and every real line bundle on it is trivial. Apply this to the defining bundle from part (c). In a global trivialization, is a smooth real function with and . Thus , or a metric-dual normal vector field, gives a global orientation of the normal line. Combining this with the standard orientation of gives an orientation of using the same normal-first convention as the outward-normal-first boundary orientation. Hence every properly embedded hypersurface in is orientable.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 ii Paper 1 21F b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
A subspace is a retract of if there is a continuous retractionsuch that for every . A space is a contractible space if its identity map is homotopic to a constant map.
Let be the inclusion and letbe a contraction, with and . Thenis continuous and satisfiesThus contracts , proving that every retract of a contractible space is contractible.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 114 1 Solution Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-03
Write as the union of slightly enlarged northern and southern hemispheres and . Both are contractible, while deformation retracts onto . The reduced Mayer–Vietoris theorem therefore givesStarting from proves the homology of a sphere:This uses no cellular homology. A reflection of reverses its orientation and has degree of a continuous mapping , so it induces the identity on , multiplication by on , and the unique map between zero groups in every other degree.
For a CW complex with skeleta , its cellular chain complex isThe differential is the connecting map to followed by passage to . Equivalently, the coefficient of a -cell in the boundary of a -cell is the degree obtained from its attaching map after collapsing the complement of that lower cell. This is the cellular boundary formula.
The quotient builds from by one -cell, so has one cell in each dimension . The two lifts of the attaching map contribute with relative sign , and the cellular homology of real projective space has differentialConsequentlyWith coefficients every differential vanishes, and hencewith zero homology outside that range.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ii Paper 3 20I Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
Suppose first that extends . Regarding as the boundary of the unit disc,is a homotopy from to the constant map with value . Thus is null-homotopic. Conversely, if is a homotopy from to a constant, then is constant on and hence descends to the quotientwhich is the cone on and is homeomorphic to . The descended map extends . This proves the extension-null-homotopy criterion for a sphere.
A universal cover of is a covering map whose total space is path-connected and simply connected. Let and be two universal covers. The lifting criterion for a covering space applies becauseso has a based lift satisfying . Similarly there is a based lift of . Both and the identity are lifts of that agree at the base point, so uniqueness of lifts gives . Likewise . Hence is a homeomorphism. This is the uniqueness of a universal covering space.
Now let be universal with contractible. If an extension exists, functoriality of the fundamental group givesThus the required factorization holds with .
Conversely, suppose . We extend over the simplices of by dimension. The boundary of every 2-simplex is a loop in that becomes null-homotopic in , so its class lies in . The factorization givesHence is null-homotopic in and extends over the disc by the first part. Since distinct 2-simplices meet along the already fixed 1-skeleton, these extensions combine to a map on .
Inductively suppose the map is defined on for . For an -simplex , its boundary is , which is simply connected. The boundary map therefore lifts through by the covering-space lifting criterion. Its lift into the contractible space is null-homotopic, so the boundary map itself is null-homotopic and extends over . Extending over every -simplex and then every skeleton constructs . The weak topology on a simplicial complex makes the cellwise map continuous. This proves the extension criterion into a space with contractible universal cover.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 131 4 b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
The Cheeger-Gromoll splitting theorem states that a complete connected Riemannian manifold with nonnegative Ricci curvature that contains a line in a Riemannian manifold is isometric to a Riemannian product
The Hadamard-Cartan theorem states that if a complete simply connected Riemannian manifold has nonpositive sectional curvature, then for every point its exponential mapis a diffeomorphism. In particular, the manifold is diffeomorphic to Euclidean space and is contractible.