By the correspondence theorem for ideals, an ideal of has the form with . If , apply unique factorization of ideals in a number field to . Every prime ideal dividing contains and hence . Primality gives , and maximality gives . Thus for some .
The inclusion forces : if , cancellation using the invertible fractional ideal would give , which is impossible. The zero ideal corresponds to , while the unit ideal corresponds to . Consequently the nonzero proper ideals are exactly
When , there are none, in agreement with being a field.
Suppose first that is -primary. Since is a Noetherian ring, choose a finite generating set of an ideal . The equality of radicals of ideals supplies positive integers with . Set
Every product of generators has some appearing at least times. Such products generate the product of ideals , so . Also . If , take directly.
Conversely, suppose . Taking radicals of ideals gives
Hence . The only maximal ideal containing is : any such maximal ideal contains and therefore equals . By the correspondence theorem for ideals, the quotient ring is a local ring with maximal ideal . Every element outside this maximal ideal is a unit.
If and , then cannot be outside , since multiplying by its inverse in the quotient ring would give . Thus and , proving the required primary ideal condition. We have proved the maximal-primary ideal criterion
For a Dedekind domain and a nonzero proper ideal , the quotient ring is a principal ideal ring. First, the correspondence theorem for ideals and unique factorization of ideals in a Dedekind domain show that the ideals of are exactly , . Consecutive powers are distinct by cancellation of invertible fractional ideals. Choose . There is no intermediate ideal between these consecutive powers, so . Multiplication by and substitution show inductively that for every . Taking gives a single generator modulo . Now factor into pairwise comaximal ideals . The Chinese remainder theorem writes as a finite direct product of rings of the preceding type, which is a principal ideal ring. It need not be an integral domain, as demonstrates. Applying the result to for any makes cyclic, yielding two generators for an ideal in a Dedekind domain.