An ideal is primary when and imply for some positive integer .
If a prime ideal is generated by a non-zero-divisor, its -primary ideals are exactly for , in any commutative ring. To prove is primary, if and , the prime ideal condition gives ; cancelling and inducting gives . Also . Conversely, for a -primary ideal , choose the least with . If , factor as far as possible with . Then , so the primary ideal condition forces , a contradiction. Thus . The powers are strictly decreasing: equality would let cancellation give . This also proves uniqueness of .
In a Noetherian ring, an ideal is -primary for a maximal ideal if and only if for some . For necessity, choose generators of and exponents with . Every product of generators lies in . If , take . Conversely the inclusions imply , so is a local ring with maximal ideal . Every element outside this maximal ideal is a unit, while every element inside is nilpotent. Therefore every zero divisor is nilpotent, which is the primary ideal condition. The reverse implication works for any commutative ring.
In the Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal , the embedding dimension is two but needs generators for every . The degree- monomials generate , and their images form a basis of , so no smaller generating list exists. These ideals are -primary: if and , then cannot be a unit; hence and . Consequently embedding dimension bounds the minimum over all maximal-primary ideals, because the maximal ideal itself is eligible, but does not bound the number of generators of each such ideal.
The radical of a primary ideal is prime. In a number ring this forces a nonzero primary ideal to have only one prime in its unique factorization.
A minimal primary decomposition of an ideal is an irredundant finite intersection of primary ideals whose radicals are pairwise distinct.
For a finite minimal primary decomposition , these are the prime ideals . This terminology applies without a Noetherian hypothesis when the decomposition exists. Its invariance follows from the intrinsic description as those prime ideals of the form , where and is a colon ideal. Indeed, , and each factor is either the whole ring or a primary ideal with radical of an ideal . A finite intersection of prime ideals can be prime only if it equals one of them: otherwise multiplying one element outside the intersection from each factor contradicts the prime ideal condition. Conversely, irredundancy supplies , giving . In a Noetherian ring these agree with the associated primes of a module . For arbitrary rings, the annihilator definition of an associated prime of a module must not be substituted without a further hypothesis.
The distinct radicals in a minimal primary decomposition are exactly the associated primes of a module , and hence are invariant. The injection into the sum of primary quotients proves one inclusion; an element supported on one component, supplied by irredundancy, proves the other. This does not imply uniqueness of embedded primary components.
A component in a minimal primary decomposition is embedded if its radical of an ideal strictly contains another radical occurring in that decomposition. Such components need not be unique. For example,
in gives different -primary ideals as embedded components, with the same isolated component .
An isolated prime of a minimal primary decomposition is a minimal member of the set of radicals of its primary components.
In a Noetherian ring, the primary component belonging to each isolated prime is uniquely determined by
Embedded primary components need not be unique.

Ancestors (7)

  1. Ideal
  2. Ring
  3. Commutative algebra
  4. Algebra
  5. Area of mathematics
  6. Mathematics
  7. Home

Synonyms (1)

Discussion (0) New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (1)